H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Greg Rusedski vs Jan-Michael Gambill H2H: 2-1
Greg Rusedski holds a 2–1 lead over Jan-Michael Gambill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–0 on grass, while Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2001 Nottingham third round 7-6(6) 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2001* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Greg Rusedski | 7-6(6) 7-6(1) | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
| Mar 9, 2001* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | (w/o) | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1999* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Greg Rusedski | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Greg Rusedski | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |