H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Jan Siemerink H2H: 3-6

Jan Siemerink holds a 6–3 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Jan Siemerink leads 5–1 on hard courts, while Greg Rusedski leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jan Siemerink won the 1998 Toulouse final 6-4 6-4.

GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 6
9 main draw meetings
NED Age 56 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 4, 1998* Toulouse ATP 250 F Hard Jan Siemerink #20 6-4 6-4 Greg Rusedski #14 Match data
Sep 6, 1998* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Jan Siemerink #21 1-6 6-4 5-7 6-2 6-4 Greg Rusedski #6 Match data
Nov 8, 1997* Stockholm ATP 250 SF Hard Jan Siemerink #105 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Greg Rusedski #5 Match data
Oct 30, 1997* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Greg Rusedski #5 6-4 6-3 Jan Siemerink #108 Match data
Jan 31, 1997* Zagreb ATP 250 R16 Carpet Greg Rusedski #56 4-6 6-3 6-2 Jan Siemerink #21 Match data
Jun 22, 1996* Nottingham ATP 250 SF Grass Jan Siemerink #25 7-6(4) 6-3 Greg Rusedski #76 Match data
Apr 11, 1996* Hong Kong ATP 250 R32 Hard Jan Siemerink #25 2-6 6-4 6-4 Greg Rusedski #46 Match data
Mar 8, 1994* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Jan Siemerink #102 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 Greg Rusedski #54 Match data
Apr 1, 1993* Osaka ATP 250 R32 Hard Greg Rusedski #158 6-4 6-1 Jan Siemerink #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Jan Siemerink #987 #14 1,863 1,908 261 260 50.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Jan Siemerink
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1990 5–4 55.6% #135 1,541 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1991 30–21 58.8% #26 1,756 0 1
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1992 22–26 45.8% #57 1,747 0 1
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1993 24–25 49.0% #53 1,670 0 1
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1994 16–19 45.7% #81 1,685 0 1
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1995 37–29 56.1% #21 1,784 0 1
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1996 35–27 56.5% #15 1,866 0 2
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 1997 18–27 40.0% #78 1,738 0 2
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 1998 38–24 61.3% #19 1,809 0 4
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 1999 17–25 40.5% #88 1,665 0 4
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2000 7–14 33.3% #104 1,576 0 4
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2001 12–17 41.4% #127 1,564 0 4
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 2002 0–2 0.0% #438 1,532 0 4