H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Jared Palmer H2H: 1-1

Greg Rusedski and Jared Palmer are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jared Palmer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jared Palmer won the 1995 Pinehurst round of 16 6-4 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Jared Palmer
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jared Palmer #68 6-4 7-6(5) Greg Rusedski #56 Match data May 12, 1995* R16 Pinehurst ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Greg Rusedski #55 7-6(5) 7-6(3) Jared Palmer #95 Match data Feb 17, 1994* R32 Philadelphia ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,052 417 278 60.0% 0 1 1 3 10 15
Jared Palmer #1,385 #35 908 1,793 69 80 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Jared Palmer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 1–2 33.3% #517 1,510 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 3–2 60.0% #240 1,575 0 0
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1990 1–2 33.3% #564 1,567 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1991 1–3 25.0% #427 1,521 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,682 0 1 1992 2–4 33.3% #149 1,536 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1993 9–14 39.1% #105 1,605 0 0
22 1996 38–26 59.4% #48 1,816 0 3 1994 28–20 58.3% #36 1,790 0 1
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,941 0 5 1995 17–20 45.9% #125 1,717 0 1
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1996 4–7 36.4% #214 1,651 0 1
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,970 0 9 — — — — — — —
26 2000 19–20 48.7% #69 1,796 0 9 1998 0–3 0.0% #174 1,598 0 1
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,809 0 10 1999 1–1 50.0% #435 1,611 0 1
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,902 0 12 2000 2–2 50.0% #357 1,621 0 1
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,823 0 13 — — — — — — —
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,821 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,786 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,640 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Greg Rusedski Jared Palmer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1994 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1995 23 15 38 60.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1993 2 7 9 22.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1996 19 15 34 55.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 1994 14 13 27 51.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 1995 10 10 20 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1998 34 11 45 75.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 1999 25 10 35 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 24 11 35 68.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2000 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 14 13 27 51.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 158 383 58.7% 25 45 70 35.7% 82 35 117 70.1% 85 40 125 68.0% — 37 43 80 46.2% 19 18 37 51.4% 7 11 18 38.9% 6 8 14 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Greg Rusedski Jared Palmer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1511 103.7 — — — — — — — 36.4% -0.45 1–1 — — +0.08
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1575 120.0 — — — — +29 — — 61.5% +0.23 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.46
18 1992 1526 107.0 -1.85 +0.57 0.973 49.7% +36 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–0 — +0.33 1990 1568 102.3 — — — — +32 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–0 0–1 — +0.10
19 1993 1751 140.1 +5.69 -3.01 1.097 51.2% -45 — -48 56.7% +0.22 10–5 (67%) 14–14 (50%) — +0.39 1991 1522 96.9 — — — — — — — 36.4% -1.09 0–1 1–1 — +0.70
20 1994 1683 135.7 +4.03 -2.97 1.022 50.1% -25 -116 +29 46.6% -0.07 8–14 (36%) 15–19 (44%) — -1.22 1992 1537 116.7 — — — — +37 — — 44.4% -0.44 0–2 — — +0.01
21 1995 1699 145.1 +4.49 -2.03 1.085 51.6% +23 -70 +37 56.7% +0.38 8–11 (42%) 22–16 (58%) — -0.02 1993 1606 122.8 — — — — -14 -61 -33 47.5% -0.26 0–8 (0%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.34
22 1996 1816 150.0 +6.92 +0.08 1.258 53.0% +15 -174 -46 56.9% +0.43 12–11 (52%) 26–20 (57%) — -1.78 1994 1790 143.7 — — — — -57 -106 — 55.1% +0.46 8–7 (53%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.51
23 1997 1942 156.9 +9.49 -0.70 1.316 53.9% +9 -283 -3 66.8% +0.94 16–12 (57%) 27–18 (60%) — -3.68 1995 1717 129.7 — — — — -40 -20 -96 47.1% -0.36 7–6 (54%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.01
24 1998 2012 159.3 +6.82 -1.21 1.168 52.2% +36 -417 -143 63.6% +0.73 16–5 (76%) 30–15 (67%) — -1.21 1996 1652 119.0 — — — — — -27 +6 44.1% -0.03 0–3 (0%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.12
25 1999 1971 155.1 +6.15 -1.39 1.158 52.0% +40 -346 -93 63.5% +0.81 12–9 (57%) 19–14 (58%) — -0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 1796 149.4 +3.25 -1.02 1.047 50.8% +86 -203 +44 51.1% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 16–10 (62%) — -3.02 1998 1598 96.8 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — +0.19
27 2001 1810 149.1 +6.33 -0.53 1.203 52.7% +5 -205 +93 59.1% +0.65 6–5 (55%) 21–16 (57%) — -1.81 1999 1612 106.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 0–1 — -0.30
28 2002 1902 150.0 +6.06 -1.57 1.129 51.6% +23 — -18 61.0% +0.69 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) — -2.14 2000 1621 116.8 — — — — +49 — — 50.0% +0.70 1–1 0–1 — -0.46
29 2003 1824 128.0 +5.26 -0.65 1.144 51.8% +15 — +122 56.0% +0.26 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 1821 132.1 +3.67 -2.78 1.017 50.5% -4 — +106 55.7% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 1787 139.4 +3.29 -2.83 0.958 49.7% -6 -261 +180 49.6% +0.03 14–3 (82%) 14–17 (45%) — -1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 1641 131.5 -1.70 -3.52 0.764 46.0% +59 -130 — 29.8% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2053 153.7 +5.40 -1.57 1.110 51.5% +18 -222 +32 57.4% +0.42 138–102 (58%) 252–196 (56%) 107.0 -2.75 — 1794 135.2 — — — — -28 -66 -49 48.1% -0.12 19–31 (38%) 35–37 (49%) 97.4 -0.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.