H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Jean-Philippe Fleurian H2H: 2-0

Greg Rusedski holds a 2–0 lead over Jean-Philippe Fleurian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 1996 China Open round of 16 6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jean-Philippe Fleurian
FRA Age 60 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Greg Rusedski #75 6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-1 Jean-Philippe Fleurian #106 Match data Oct 11, 1996* R16 China Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Greg Rusedski #49 7-6(4) 6-4 Jean-Philippe Fleurian #97 Match data Apr 25, 1996* R32 Seoul World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,052 417 278 60.0% 0 1 1 3 10 15
Jean-Philippe Fleurian #1,024 #37 645 1,759 106 156 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Jean-Philippe Fleurian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1985 0–2 0.0% #151 1,473 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,682 0 1 1986 6–3 66.7% #78 1,593 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1987 4–11 26.7% #129 1,526 0 0
22 1996 38–26 59.4% #48 1,816 0 3 1988 3–7 30.0% #108 1,491 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,941 0 5 1989 12–11 52.2% #78 1,638 0 0
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1990 23–29 44.2% #67 1,618 0 0
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,970 0 9 1991 20–28 41.7% #73 1,584 0 0
26 2000 19–20 48.7% #69 1,796 0 9 1992 1–11 8.3% #223 1,491 0 0
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,809 0 10 1993 1–4 20.0% #106 1,458 0 0
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,902 0 12 1994 19–21 47.5% #96 1,584 0 0
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,823 0 13 1995 4–9 30.8% #158 1,547 0 0
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,821 0 14 1996 9–15 37.5% #115 1,580 0 0
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,786 0 15 1997 4–5 44.4% #247 1,575 0 0
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,640 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Greg Rusedski Jean-Philippe Fleurian
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1992 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1985 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1994 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1986 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1995 23 15 38 60.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1996 19 15 34 55.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
24 1998 34 11 45 75.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1990 17 15 32 53.1% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 1999 25 10 35 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1991 10 17 27 37.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 2000 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 0 6 6 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2002 24 11 35 68.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
30 2004 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 2005 14 13 27 51.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1997 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
32 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 158 383 58.7% 25 45 70 35.7% 82 35 117 70.1% 85 40 125 68.0% — 59 85 144 41.0% 27 44 71 38.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 14 18 32 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 600/695 of Greg Rusedski's and 133/151 of Jean-Philippe Fleurian's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Greg Rusedski Jean-Philippe Fleurian
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1992 4/4 9.8 7.0 51.6% 77.5% 36.6% 52.3% 35.2% 57.2% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 23/25 14.0 4.9 57.6% 82.3% 54.7% 68.5% 39.0% 70.5% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 46/50 9.2 5.2 56.6% 78.6% 51.6% 59.6% 32.6% 66.8% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 50/59 11.7 6.1 56.7% 81.6% 49.8% 64.1% 40.5% 67.8% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 53/64 11.6 2.9 60.5% 81.7% 53.2% 57.4% 39.6% 70.7% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 61/76 14.0 4.6 57.5% 85.1% 57.1% 67.5% 45.1% 73.2% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 59/72 12.0 5.0 55.8% 82.2% 54.4% 68.1% 41.7% 69.8% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 51/68 10.5 4.7 58.2% 80.2% 54.7% 62.4% 35.4% 69.4% 35.5% 1991 43/48 3.2 2.9 58.5% 65.9% 50.1% 57.6% 45.4% 59.1% 38.8%
26 2000 35/39 9.0 5.0 57.8% 76.0% 52.5% 67.6% 37.4% 66.1% 35.5% 1992 8/12 3.0 4.9 57.0% 62.5% 41.3% 56.7% 50.2% 52.7% 34.0%
27 2001 52/61 10.3 3.4 58.7% 80.6% 54.5% 60.6% 36.9% 69.8% 36.4% 1993 4/5 3.3 2.5 66.1% 64.5% 44.2% 50.2% 30.4% 57.8% 35.6%
28 2002 39/49 11.0 4.0 60.9% 79.5% 54.3% 71.1% 41.1% 69.6% 34.3% 1994 38/40 3.4 2.8 57.8% 69.3% 51.5% 62.3% 46.0% 61.8% 39.9%
29 2003 19/19 12.4 4.0 63.5% 78.9% 56.2% 72.5% 43.3% 70.5% 33.7% 1995 10/13 3.4 2.6 59.2% 66.7% 51.5% 53.6% 35.5% 60.0% 33.1%
30 2004 39/39 11.2 5.6 60.0% 78.2% 53.7% 68.1% 45.0% 68.3% 32.2% 1996 22/24 3.2 2.5 59.3% 69.1% 46.9% 45.3% 35.1% 59.9% 33.5%
31 2005 48/49 9.6 5.8 57.5% 77.2% 53.4% 69.9% 33.8% 67.0% 31.6% 1997 8/9 1.5 2.6 60.4% 65.8% 54.3% 64.9% 63.4% 61.0% 36.2%
32 2006 21/21 6.2 4.5 60.8% 66.8% 47.5% 53.1% 38.7% 59.3% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 600/695 11.0 4.7 58.3% 79.9% 53.5% 64.8% 39.2% 68.8% 34.6% — 133/262 3.2 2.9 58.8% 67.2% 49.6% 56.8% 44.1% 59.7% 37.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Greg Rusedski Jean-Philippe Fleurian
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1992 1526 107.0 -1.85 +0.57 0.973 49.7% +36 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–0 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1751 140.1 +5.69 -3.01 1.097 51.2% -45 — -48 56.7% +0.22 10–5 (67%) 14–14 (50%) — +0.39 1985 1473 100.6 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.16
20 1994 1683 135.7 +4.03 -2.97 1.022 50.1% -25 -116 +29 46.6% -0.07 8–14 (36%) 15–19 (44%) — -1.22 1986 1593 116.2 — — — — +20 -59 — 59.3% +0.22 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.77
21 1995 1699 145.1 +4.49 -2.03 1.085 51.6% +23 -70 +37 56.7% +0.38 8–11 (42%) 22–16 (58%) — -0.02 1987 1527 113.2 — — — — +52 -41 — 31.7% -1.27 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.86
22 1996 1816 150.0 +6.92 +0.08 1.258 53.0% +15 -174 -46 56.9% +0.43 12–11 (52%) 26–20 (57%) — -1.78 1988 1491 114.6 — — — — +58 -15 — 37.0% -0.74 1–3 (25%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.53
23 1997 1942 156.9 +9.49 -0.70 1.316 53.9% +9 -283 -3 66.8% +0.94 16–12 (57%) 27–18 (60%) — -3.68 1989 1639 132.5 — — — — -41 -47 — 53.7% +0.27 3–5 (38%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.40
24 1998 2012 159.3 +6.82 -1.21 1.168 52.2% +36 -417 -143 63.6% +0.73 16–5 (76%) 30–15 (67%) — -1.21 1990 1618 136.2 — — — — +34 -39 — 47.0% -0.13 8–13 (38%) 10–13 (43%) — -0.54
25 1999 1971 155.1 +6.15 -1.39 1.158 52.0% +40 -346 -93 63.5% +0.81 12–9 (57%) 19–14 (58%) — -0.97 1991 1585 131.0 -1.30 -0.21 0.948 49.4% -46 +40 -3 45.5% -0.20 7–10 (41%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.26
26 2000 1796 149.4 +3.25 -1.02 1.047 50.8% +86 -203 +44 51.1% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 16–10 (62%) — -3.02 1992 1492 107.3 -3.38 -1.76 0.719 43.9% -10 +59 — 21.9% -1.53 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.48
27 2001 1810 149.1 +6.33 -0.53 1.203 52.7% +5 -205 +93 59.1% +0.65 6–5 (55%) 21–16 (57%) — -1.81 1993 1458 103.6 -1.27 -2.28 0.843 46.2% — +74 — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.38
28 2002 1902 150.0 +6.06 -1.57 1.129 51.6% +23 — -18 61.0% +0.69 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) — -2.14 1994 1584 134.3 +0.12 +0.95 1.044 51.2% -69 +41 +35 48.9% +0.19 3–4 (43%) 3–13 (19%) — +1.05
29 2003 1824 128.0 +5.26 -0.65 1.144 51.8% +15 — +122 56.0% +0.26 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.36 1995 1548 113.0 -1.51 -3.23 0.827 47.0% -13 — — 29.4% -1.06 2–1 (67%) 1–6 (14%) — +0.15
30 2004 1821 132.1 +3.67 -2.78 1.017 50.5% -4 — +106 55.7% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) — -0.15 1996 1580 131.7 -0.94 -1.50 0.836 46.7% +26 — — 33.9% -1.20 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.99
31 2005 1787 139.4 +3.29 -2.83 0.958 49.7% -6 -261 +180 49.6% +0.03 14–3 (82%) 14–17 (45%) — -1.02 1997 1576 108.6 -1.70 -1.08 0.928 48.6% -5 — +76 47.6% 0.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.85
32 2006 1641 131.5 -1.70 -3.52 0.764 46.0% +59 -130 — 29.8% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2053 153.7 +5.40 -1.57 1.110 51.5% +18 -222 +32 57.4% +0.42 138–102 (58%) 252–196 (56%) 107.0 -2.75 — 1759 133.6 -1.00 -0.53 0.926 48.8% -7 +5 +36 43.1% -0.38 31–51 (38%) 41–62 (40%) 92.0 +1.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.