H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Greg Rusedski vs Jean-Philippe Fleurian H2H: 2-0
Greg Rusedski holds a 2–0 lead over Jean-Philippe Fleurian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 1996 Beijing fourth round 6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1996* | Beijing | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Greg Rusedski | 6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-1 | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1996* | Seoul | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Greg Rusedski | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Jean-Philippe Fleurian | #1,024 | #37 | 645 | 1,758 | 106 | 156 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Greg Rusedski | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #78 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #129 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #78 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 23–29 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 | 1992 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #223 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #106 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #158 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 | 1997 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #247 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |