H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Greg Rusedski vs Jim Courier H2H: 0-3
Jim Courier holds a 3–0 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1996 Cincinnati Masters third round 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1996* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jim Courier | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
| Sep 30, 1995* | Basel | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Jim Courier | 6-4 6-4 | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
| Apr 14, 1995* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jim Courier | 4-6 7-6(7) 6-4 | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,218 | 487 | 222 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Greg Rusedski | Jim Courier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 |
| 21 | 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,086 | 3 | 9 |
| 22 | 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 |
| 23 | 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,888 | 4 | 14 |
| 24 | 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 4 | 18 |
| 25 | 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,848 | 4 | 19 |
| 26 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 |
| 27 | 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,738 | 4 | 23 |
| 28 | 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 |
| 30 | 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |