H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Greg Rusedski vs Jim Grabb H2H: 1-0
Greg Rusedski holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 1995 Bordeaux third round 6-3 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 1995* | Bordeaux | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Greg Rusedski | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Greg Rusedski | Jim Grabb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 |