H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Joachim Johansson H2H: 1-3

Joachim Johansson holds a 3–1 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Joachim Johansson leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Joachim Johansson won the 2005 Wimbledon second round 7-6(10) 3-6 6-4 7-6(5).

GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
SWE Age 44 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 24, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Joachim Johansson #10 7-6(10) 3-6 6-4 7-6(5) Greg Rusedski #40 Match data
Jan 13, 2005* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Joachim Johansson #11 6-4 6-3 Greg Rusedski #45 Match data
Oct 16, 2004* Moscow ATP 250 QF Carpet Greg Rusedski #81 7-6(5) 6-7(1) 7-6(7) Joachim Johansson #14 Match data
Jul 19, 2004 Indianapolis ATP 250 R32 Hard Joachim Johansson #32 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 Greg Rusedski #89 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Joachim Johansson #705 #9 1,980 1,942 69 53 56.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Joachim Johansson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 0–2 0.0% #773 1,479 0 0
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 2001 0–2 0.0% #390 1,463 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 2002 1–1 50.0% #219 1,478 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 2003 2–4 33.3% #95 1,533 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 2004 34–21 61.8% #11 1,821 0 1
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 2005 18–12 60.0% #53 1,743 0 3
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 2006 5–3 62.5% #193 1,781 0 3
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 2007 4–4 50.0% #350 1,736 0 3
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 2008 1–1 50.0% #771 1,738 0 3
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 2009 3–2 60.0% #365 1,769 0 3
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2013 1–1 50.0% #694 1,794 0 3
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15