H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Joachim Johansson H2H: 1-3

Joachim Johansson holds a 3–1 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Joachim Johansson leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Joachim Johansson won the 2005 Wimbledon round of 64 7-6(10) 3-6 6-4 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 53 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Joachim Johansson
SWE Age 44 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Joachim Johansson #10 7-6(10) 3-6 6-4 7-6(5) Greg Rusedski #40 Match data Jun 24, 2005* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Joachim Johansson #11 6-4 6-3 Greg Rusedski #45 Match data Jan 13, 2005* R32 Sydney International ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Greg Rusedski #81 7-6(5) 6-7(1) 7-6(7) Joachim Johansson #14 Match data Oct 16, 2004* QF Moscow International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Joachim Johansson #32 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 Greg Rusedski #89 Match data Jul 22, 2004* R32 Indianapolis International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,052 417 278 60.0% 0 1 1 3 10 15
Joachim Johansson #705 #9 1,980 1,944 70 54 56.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Joachim Johansson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2000 0–2 0.0% #773 1,479 0 0
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 2001 0–2 0.0% #390 1,464 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 2002 1–1 50.0% #219 1,478 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,682 0 1 2003 2–4 33.3% #95 1,533 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 2004 35–22 61.4% #11 1,822 0 1
22 1996 38–26 59.4% #48 1,816 0 3 2005 18–12 60.0% #53 1,745 0 3
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,941 0 5 2006 5–3 62.5% #193 1,792 0 3
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 2007 4–4 50.0% #350 1,756 0 3
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,970 0 9 2008 1–1 50.0% #771 1,757 0 3
26 2000 19–20 48.7% #69 1,796 0 9 2009 3–2 60.0% #365 1,783 0 3
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,809 0 10 — — — — — — —
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,902 0 12 — — — — — — —
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,823 0 13 — — — — — — —
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,821 0 14 2013 1–1 50.0% #694 1,807 0 3
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,786 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,640 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Greg Rusedski Joachim Johansson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1992 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2003 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1995 23 15 38 60.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2004 26 12 38 68.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 1996 19 15 34 55.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 2005 15 5 20 75.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 2006 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 34 11 45 75.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 2007 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 25 10 35 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 24 11 35 68.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 14 13 27 51.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 158 383 58.7% 25 45 70 35.7% 82 35 117 70.1% 85 40 125 68.0% — 58 35 93 62.4% 2 11 13 15.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 600/695 of Greg Rusedski's and 119/124 of Joachim Johansson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Greg Rusedski Joachim Johansson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 2/2 6.5 2.5 43.0% 74.0% 40.0% 40.0% 0.0% 54.3% 26.6%
18 1992 4/4 9.8 7.0 51.6% 77.5% 36.6% 52.3% 35.2% 57.2% 41.6% 2001 2/2 9.5 5.5 50.2% 74.2% 42.5% 50.0% 50.0% 58.4% 28.9%
19 1993 23/25 14.0 4.9 57.6% 82.3% 54.7% 68.5% 39.0% 70.5% 32.3% 2002 2/2 16.0 1.5 66.0% 84.1% 49.3% 60.0% 24.0% 72.5% 37.8%
20 1994 46/50 9.2 5.2 56.6% 78.6% 51.6% 59.6% 32.6% 66.8% 34.0% 2003 6/6 11.3 5.8 56.6% 81.0% 48.6% 41.4% 16.7% 66.5% 29.6%
21 1995 50/59 11.7 6.1 56.7% 81.6% 49.8% 64.1% 40.5% 67.8% 34.9% 2004 55/57 15.8 4.7 63.5% 81.0% 54.4% 71.6% 35.8% 71.5% 32.3%
22 1996 53/64 11.6 2.9 60.5% 81.7% 53.2% 57.4% 39.6% 70.7% 36.8% 2005 30/30 14.1 4.7 59.6% 78.1% 53.7% 69.9% 34.4% 68.0% 31.8%
23 1997 61/76 14.0 4.6 57.5% 85.1% 57.1% 67.5% 45.1% 73.2% 35.2% 2006 7/8 16.0 3.4 64.4% 78.3% 51.2% 65.7% 44.5% 68.9% 30.9%
24 1998 59/72 12.0 5.0 55.8% 82.2% 54.4% 68.1% 41.7% 69.8% 35.3% 2007 6/8 9.3 3.0 62.6% 78.5% 55.7% 83.3% 46.3% 69.5% 30.8%
25 1999 51/68 10.5 4.7 58.2% 80.2% 54.7% 62.4% 35.4% 69.4% 35.5% 2008 2/2 11.5 2.5 59.2% 83.3% 47.4% 25.0% 20.0% 68.6% 22.1%
26 2000 35/39 9.0 5.0 57.8% 76.0% 52.5% 67.6% 37.4% 66.1% 35.5% 2009 5/5 16.4 2.6 65.8% 83.1% 57.7% 91.2% 30.0% 74.4% 33.0%
27 2001 52/61 10.3 3.4 58.7% 80.6% 54.5% 60.6% 36.9% 69.8% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 39/49 11.0 4.0 60.9% 79.5% 54.3% 71.1% 41.1% 69.6% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 19/19 12.4 4.0 63.5% 78.9% 56.2% 72.5% 43.3% 70.5% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 39/39 11.2 5.6 60.0% 78.2% 53.7% 68.1% 45.0% 68.3% 32.2% 2013 2/2 11.0 2.0 60.2% 77.2% 53.6% 90.9% 57.1% 67.7% 33.3%
31 2005 48/49 9.6 5.8 57.5% 77.2% 53.4% 69.9% 33.8% 67.0% 31.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 21/21 6.2 4.5 60.8% 66.8% 47.5% 53.1% 38.7% 59.3% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 600/695 11.0 4.7 58.3% 79.9% 53.5% 64.8% 39.2% 68.8% 34.6% — 119/124 14.4 4.3 61.6% 79.8% 53.3% 69.1% 34.8% 69.6% 31.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Greg Rusedski Joachim Johansson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1480 101.1 +0.16 -4.62 0.582 42.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.01
18 1992 1526 107.0 -1.85 +0.57 0.973 49.7% +36 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–0 — +0.33 2001 1464 107.6 -0.36 -3.00 0.694 44.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.04
19 1993 1751 140.1 +5.69 -3.01 1.097 51.2% -45 — -48 56.7% +0.22 10–5 (67%) 14–14 (50%) 108.0 +0.39 2002 1478 107.9 +1.40 -1.20 1.372 52.7% — — — 60.0% +0.80 0–1 1–1 — +0.11
20 1994 1683 135.7 +4.03 -2.97 1.022 50.1% -25 -116 +29 46.6% -0.07 8–14 (36%) 15–19 (44%) 96.1 -1.22 2003 1534 108.8 +0.29 -2.04 0.885 46.8% +69 — — 26.7% -1.53 1–0 — — +0.50
21 1995 1699 145.1 +4.49 -2.03 1.085 51.6% +23 -70 +37 56.7% +0.38 8–11 (42%) 22–16 (58%) 101.1 -0.02 2004 1823 147.4 +6.94 -3.01 1.131 51.6% +32 -347 -193 59.7% +0.63 8–4 (67%) 21–25 (46%) 103.9 +0.65
22 1996 1816 150.0 +6.92 +0.08 1.258 53.0% +15 -174 -46 56.9% +0.43 12–11 (52%) 26–20 (57%) 103.7 -1.78 2005 1746 133.6 +3.26 -3.57 0.996 49.8% +158 -311 -84 59.2% +0.32 5–3 (63%) 13–9 (59%) 103.6 +1.13
23 1997 1942 156.9 +9.49 -0.70 1.316 53.9% +9 -283 -3 66.8% +0.94 16–12 (57%) 27–18 (60%) 107.0 -3.68 2006 1792 126.0 +4.03 -1.49 0.995 50.5% +124 — — 66.7% +0.50 2–2 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 98.7 +0.07
24 1998 2012 159.3 +6.82 -1.21 1.168 52.2% +36 -417 -143 63.6% +0.73 16–5 (76%) 30–15 (67%) 110.1 -1.21 2007 1756 109.9 +1.65 -2.24 1.009 50.9% +90 — — 69.2% +0.69 0–1 2–0 — +0.49
25 1999 1971 155.1 +6.15 -1.39 1.158 52.0% +40 -346 -93 63.5% +0.81 12–9 (57%) 19–14 (58%) 99.1 -0.97 2008 1757 110.4 +0.63 -1.33 0.705 44.5% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — 1–0 — -0.18
26 2000 1796 149.4 +3.25 -1.02 1.047 50.8% +86 -203 +44 51.1% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 16–10 (62%) 95.3 -3.02 2009 1784 122.5 +5.13 -1.27 1.289 52.7% +68 — — 63.6% +0.64 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.57
27 2001 1810 149.1 +6.33 -0.53 1.203 52.7% +5 -205 +93 59.1% +0.65 6–5 (55%) 21–16 (57%) 101.3 -1.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 1902 150.0 +6.06 -1.57 1.129 51.6% +23 — -18 61.0% +0.69 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) 104.0 -2.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 1824 128.0 +5.26 -0.65 1.144 51.8% +15 — +122 56.0% +0.26 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) 95.2 -1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 1821 132.1 +3.67 -2.78 1.017 50.5% -4 — +106 55.7% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) 107.8 -0.15 2013 1807 122.3 -0.21 +1.70 1.030 52.2% — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — -0.31
31 2005 1787 139.4 +3.29 -2.83 0.958 49.7% -6 -261 +180 49.6% +0.03 14–3 (82%) 14–17 (45%) 104.6 -1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 1641 131.5 -1.70 -3.52 0.764 46.0% +59 -130 — 29.8% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 100.7 -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2053 153.7 +5.40 -1.57 1.110 51.5% +18 -222 +32 57.4% +0.42 138–102 (58%) 252–196 (56%) 107.0 -2.75 — 1944 141.6 +4.61 -2.79 1.043 50.5% +77 -329 -153 57.4% +0.36 16–12 (57%) 43–42 (51%) 103.1 +1.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.