H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 1-2

Juan Ignacio Chela holds a 2–1 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Juan Ignacio Chela leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Chela won the 2006 Monte-Carlo Masters round of 64 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1.

GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 2
3 main draw meetings
ARG Age 47 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Juan Ignacio Chela #30 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 Greg Rusedski #46 Match data Apr 19, 2006* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Juan Ignacio Chela #33 6-4 6-4 Greg Rusedski #48 Match data Mar 22, 2006* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Greg Rusedski #112 7-6(1) 7-6(5) Juan Ignacio Chela #40 Match data Jan 15, 2004* R32 Sydney International International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,052 417 278 60.0% 0 1 1 3 10 15
Juan Ignacio Chela #967 #15 1,510 1,908 307 270 53.2% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Juan Ignacio Chela
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1999 0–3 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,682 0 1 2000 14–16 46.7% #63 1,558 0 1
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 2001 10–10 50.0% #70 1,601 0 1
22 1996 38–26 59.4% #48 1,816 0 3 2002 44–27 62.0% #23 1,782 0 2
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,941 0 5 2003 35–27 56.5% #38 1,762 0 2
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 2004 33–26 55.9% #26 1,718 0 3
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,970 0 9 2005 28–26 51.9% #39 1,690 0 3
26 2000 19–20 48.7% #69 1,796 0 9 2006 27–26 50.9% #33 1,722 0 3
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,809 0 10 2007 39–23 62.9% #20 1,795 0 4
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,902 0 12 2008 11–12 47.8% #140 1,737 0 4
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,823 0 13 2009 9–14 39.1% #73 1,731 0 4
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,821 0 14 2010 28–24 53.8% #38 1,837 0 6
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,786 0 15 2011 24–24 50.0% #29 1,737 0 6
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,640 0 15 2012 5–12 29.4% #176 1,633 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Greg Rusedski Juan Ignacio Chela
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1992 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1994 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1995 23 15 38 60.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2001 2 5 7 28.6% 8 5 13 61.5%
22 1996 19 15 34 55.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 2002 24 14 38 63.2% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 2003 20 14 34 58.8% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1998 34 11 45 75.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 20 11 31 64.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1999 25 10 35 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 2005 20 14 34 58.8% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2000 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2006 10 11 21 47.6% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2007 17 11 28 60.7% 21 10 31 67.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2002 24 11 35 68.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2008 2 4 6 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9%
29 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 8 11 19 42.1%
30 2004 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 2010 7 11 18 38.9% 21 12 33 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2005 14 13 27 51.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 19 13 32 59.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 225 158 383 58.7% 25 45 70 35.7% 82 35 117 70.1% 85 40 125 68.0% 122 120 242 50.4% 179 131 310 57.7% 4 11 15 26.7% 2 8 10 20.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 600/695 of Greg Rusedski's and 447/453 of Juan Ignacio Chela's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Greg Rusedski Juan Ignacio Chela
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1992 4/4 9.8 7.0 51.6% 77.5% 36.6% 52.3% 35.2% 57.2% 41.6% —/—
19 1993 23/25 14.0 4.9 57.6% 82.3% 54.7% 68.5% 39.0% 70.5% 32.3% —/—
20 1994 46/50 9.2 5.2 56.6% 78.6% 51.6% 59.6% 32.6% 66.8% 34.0% —/—
21 1995 50/59 11.7 6.1 56.7% 81.6% 49.8% 64.1% 40.5% 67.8% 34.9% —/—
22 1996 53/64 11.6 2.9 60.5% 81.7% 53.2% 57.4% 39.6% 70.7% 36.8% —/—
23 1997 61/76 14.0 4.6 57.5% 85.1% 57.1% 67.5% 45.1% 73.2% 35.2% 2003 58/62 4.0 4.4 58.8% 69.7% 47.9% 54.8% 45.2% 60.5% 40.8%
24 1998 59/72 12.0 5.0 55.8% 82.2% 54.4% 68.1% 41.7% 69.8% 35.3% 2004 58/59 2.8 2.4 65.3% 66.8% 49.9% 53.6% 46.0% 60.9% 42.5%
25 1999 51/68 10.5 4.7 58.2% 80.2% 54.7% 62.4% 35.4% 69.4% 35.5% 2005 54/54 3.1 2.5 62.6% 68.2% 50.1% 56.5% 43.2% 61.3% 39.8%
26 2000 35/39 9.0 5.0 57.8% 76.0% 52.5% 67.6% 37.4% 66.1% 35.5% 2006 53/53 2.6 1.9 60.4% 69.2% 52.7% 63.5% 44.0% 62.5% 39.4%
27 2001 52/61 10.3 3.4 58.7% 80.6% 54.5% 60.6% 36.9% 69.8% 36.4% 2007 62/62 2.8 3.4 58.0% 69.7% 51.5% 54.4% 43.9% 62.2% 40.8%
28 2002 39/49 11.0 4.0 60.9% 79.5% 54.3% 71.1% 41.1% 69.6% 34.3% 2008 23/23 1.6 4.0 58.1% 62.8% 49.0% 56.5% 48.6% 56.9% 38.6%
29 2003 19/19 12.4 4.0 63.5% 78.9% 56.2% 72.5% 43.3% 70.5% 33.7% 2009 23/23 1.8 3.1 61.8% 66.1% 45.1% 61.1% 39.4% 58.1% 40.6%
30 2004 39/39 11.2 5.6 60.0% 78.2% 53.7% 68.1% 45.0% 68.3% 32.2% 2010 51/52 1.9 2.0 61.6% 65.8% 53.2% 54.6% 51.9% 60.9% 42.5%
31 2005 48/49 9.6 5.8 57.5% 77.2% 53.4% 69.9% 33.8% 67.0% 31.6% 2011 48/48 1.9 2.4 65.4% 65.6% 50.5% 58.7% 47.1% 60.3% 41.6%
32 2006 21/21 6.2 4.5 60.8% 66.8% 47.5% 53.1% 38.7% 59.3% 31.1% 2012 17/17 2.1 2.4 65.3% 61.8% 49.9% 56.0% 40.5% 57.6% 39.1%
Career 600/695 11.0 4.7 58.3% 79.9% 53.5% 64.8% 39.2% 68.8% 34.6% 447/577 2.6 2.8 61.6% 67.4% 50.4% 56.7% 45.4% 60.7% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Greg Rusedski Juan Ignacio Chela
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1992 1526 107.0 -1.85 +0.57 0.973 49.7% +36 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–0 +0.33
19 1993 1751 140.1 +5.69 -3.01 1.097 51.2% -45 -48 56.7% +0.22 10–5 (67%) 14–14 (50%) +0.39 1999 1464 96.2 14.3% -2.28 0–1 +0.19
20 1994 1683 135.7 +4.03 -2.97 1.022 50.1% -25 -116 +29 46.6% -0.07 8–14 (36%) 15–19 (44%) -1.22 2000 1559 133.5 -63 +120 44.9% -0.28 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) -0.31
21 1995 1699 145.1 +4.49 -2.03 1.085 51.6% +23 -70 +37 56.7% +0.38 8–11 (42%) 22–16 (58%) -0.02 2001 1602 129.7 -95 +120 56.9% +0.49 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) +1.29
22 1996 1816 150.0 +6.92 +0.08 1.258 53.0% +15 -174 -46 56.9% +0.43 12–11 (52%) 26–20 (57%) -1.78 2002 1783 151.5 -32 +59 56.5% +0.48 18–8 (69%) 18–14 (56%) -1.32
23 1997 1942 156.9 +9.49 -0.70 1.316 53.9% +9 -283 -3 66.8% +0.94 16–12 (57%) 27–18 (60%) -3.68 2003 1762 142.3 -1.02 +3.12 1.035 50.6% -22 +63 54.2% +0.28 11–8 (58%) 14–7 (67%) -0.30
24 1998 2012 159.3 +6.82 -1.21 1.168 52.2% +36 -417 -143 63.6% +0.73 16–5 (76%) 30–15 (67%) -1.21 2004 1718 148.1 -1.13 +4.91 1.089 51.6% -9 +123 53.9% +0.42 11–10 (52%) 5–11 (31%) -1.39
25 1999 1971 155.1 +6.15 -1.39 1.158 52.0% +40 -346 -93 63.5% +0.81 12–9 (57%) 19–14 (58%) -0.97 2005 1691 142.8 -0.78 +2.25 1.029 50.3% +64 +15 51.9% +0.01 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) +0.41
26 2000 1796 149.4 +3.25 -1.02 1.047 50.8% +86 -203 +44 51.1% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 16–10 (62%) -3.02 2006 1723 142.8 +0.65 +1.91 1.053 50.9% +36 +10 50.4% -0.03 6–11 (35%) 6–11 (35%) -0.31
27 2001 1810 149.1 +6.33 -0.53 1.203 52.7% +5 -205 +93 59.1% +0.65 6–5 (55%) 21–16 (57%) -1.81 2007 1796 148.8 -0.41 +3.45 1.078 51.3% +38 +27 -340 56.3% +0.40 15–5 (75%) 8–10 (44%) +2.42
28 2002 1902 150.0 +6.06 -1.57 1.129 51.6% +23 -18 61.0% +0.69 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) -2.14 2008 1738 127.4 -3.84 +1.12 0.895 47.8% +27 +71 41.1% -0.75 6–2 (75%) 2–5 (29%) +0.48
29 2003 1824 128.0 +5.26 -0.65 1.144 51.8% +15 +122 56.0% +0.26 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) -1.36 2009 1732 139.8 -3.44 +1.91 0.970 49.2% -13 +55 43.1% -0.12 5–6 (45%) 1–2 (33%) -0.53
30 2004 1821 132.1 +3.67 -2.78 1.017 50.5% -4 +106 55.7% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) -0.15 2010 1838 147.5 -1.66 +4.86 1.088 51.7% -116 +93 51.2% +0.38 9–7 (56%) 8–12 (40%) -0.78
31 2005 1787 139.4 +3.29 -2.83 0.958 49.7% -6 -261 +180 49.6% +0.03 14–3 (82%) 14–17 (45%) -1.02 2011 1738 144.8 -2.16 +3.38 1.047 50.9% -88 +162 50.0% +0.18 9–10 (47%) 5–7 (42%) +2.14
32 2006 1641 131.5 -1.70 -3.52 0.764 46.0% +59 -130 29.8% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–6 (33%) -1.33 2012 1634 126.2 -2.43 +0.71 0.923 48.4% +23 +118 42.9% -0.67 1–8 (11%) 4–2 (67%) +1.58
Career 2053 153.7 +5.40 -1.57 1.110 51.5% +18 -222 +32 57.4% +0.42 138–102 (58%) 252–196 (56%) 107.0 -2.75 1909 149.6 -1.24 +3.12 1.040 50.7% -9 +79 -340 51.6% +0.16 107–94 (53%) 92–103 (47%) 98.2 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.