H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Karim Alami H2H: 4-0

Greg Rusedski holds a 4–0 lead over Karim Alami in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2000 Basel third round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Karim Alami
MAR Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 26, 2000* Basel ATP 250 R32 Carpet Greg Rusedski #69 7-5 6-1 Karim Alami #43 Match data
Apr 27, 2000* Barcelona ATP 250 R32 Clay Greg Rusedski #16 6-3 3-6 6-2 Karim Alami #29 Match data
Mar 5, 1998* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Carpet Greg Rusedski #6 6-7(7) 7-6(3) 7-6(4) Karim Alami #54 Match data
Jan 9, 1998* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Greg Rusedski #6 6-2 7-5 Karim Alami #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Karim Alami #1,418 #25 1,196 1,798 140 177 44.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Karim Alami
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #340 1,488 0 0
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1992 0–2 0.0% #437 1,463 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1993 2–2 50.0% #205 1,478 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1994 12–19 38.7% #88 1,506 0 0
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1995 15–14 51.7% #73 1,615 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1996 16–21 43.2% #56 1,650 0 2
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1997 23–27 46.0% #55 1,619 0 2
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1998 19–21 47.5% #72 1,644 0 2
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1999 26–22 54.2% #31 1,734 0 2
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 2000 21–28 42.9% #57 1,601 0 2
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 2001 5–17 22.7% #203 1,512 0 2
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2002 1–2 33.3% #479 1,523 0 2
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2003 0–1 0.0% #990 1,510 0 2
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 — — — — — — —