H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Laurence Tieleman H2H: 2-2

Greg Rusedski and Laurence Tieleman are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–1 on grass, while Laurence Tieleman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laurence Tieleman won the 1999 Tashkent third round 6-3 6-4.

GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 16, 1999* Tashkent ATP 250 R32 Hard Laurence Tieleman #95 6-3 6-4 Greg Rusedski #7 Match data
Jun 12, 1998* Queen's Club ATP 250 R16 Grass Laurence Tieleman #253 2-2 (ret.) Greg Rusedski #4 Match data
Jun 12, 1996* Queen's Club ATP 250 R64 Grass Greg Rusedski #76 7-6(4) 6-3 Laurence Tieleman #154 Match data
Jul 9, 1993* Newport ATP 250 R16 Grass Greg Rusedski #151 7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 Laurence Tieleman #134 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Laurence Tieleman #1,442 #76 625 1,652 41 62 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Laurence Tieleman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1993 4–4 50.0% #148 1,539 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1994 0–1 0.0% #163 1,532 0 0
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1995 2–4 33.3% #197 1,525 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1996 1–4 20.0% #240 1,483 0 0
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1997 0–2 0.0% #297 1,458 0 0
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1998 10–7 58.8% #107 1,593 0 0
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1999 14–21 40.0% #87 1,604 0 0
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 2000 10–19 34.5% #136 1,541 0 0
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15