H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 3-4

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 4–3 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2005 Cincinnati Masters third round 1-6 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 18, 2005* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #3 1-6 7-5 6-4 Greg Rusedski #35 Match data
Aug 12, 2002 Indianapolis ATP 250 R16 Hard Greg Rusedski #41 7-6(3) 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #1 Match data
Jun 16, 2001* Queen's Club ATP 250 QF Grass Lleyton Hewitt #6 6-4 6-4 Greg Rusedski #46 Match data
Mar 3, 2001* San Jose ATP 250 QF Hard Greg Rusedski #58 5-7 6-1 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #6 Match data
Nov 5, 2000* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #8 6-4 6-4 Greg Rusedski #89 Match data
Oct 28, 2000* Basel ATP 250 QF Carpet Lleyton Hewitt #9 7-6(5) 6-2 Greg Rusedski #69 Match data
Jun 19, 1999* Nottingham ATP 250 QF Grass Greg Rusedski #13 6-4 7-5 Lleyton Hewitt #36 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 — — — — — — — 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 — — — — — — — 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 — — — — — — — 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30