H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Magnus Gustafsson H2H: 3-0

Greg Rusedski holds a 3–0 lead over Magnus Gustafsson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2000 US Open first round 6-1 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Magnus Gustafsson
SWE Age 59 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 30, 2000* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Greg Rusedski #34 6-1 6-2 6-4 Magnus Gustafsson #52 Match data
Nov 8, 1998* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Carpet Greg Rusedski #13 6-3 6-2 Magnus Gustafsson #33 Match data
Oct 23, 1993* Beijing ATP 250 QF Carpet Greg Rusedski #77 7-5 4-6 7-6(2) Magnus Gustafsson #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Magnus Gustafsson #681 #10 2,141 2,012 394 252 61.0% 0 0 0 0 14 14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Magnus Gustafsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1986 0–2 0.0% #273 1,479 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1987 5–4 55.6% #53 1,586 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1988 24–19 55.8% #51 1,710 0 0
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1989 23–18 56.1% #34 1,804 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1990 25–16 61.0% #31 1,825 0 0
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1991 47–17 73.4% #12 1,947 0 3
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1992 26–20 56.5% #47 1,787 0 4
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1993 50–29 63.3% #14 1,891 0 5
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 1994 26–11 70.3% #33 1,857 0 7
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 1995 11–11 50.0% #84 1,732 0 7
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 1996 36–16 69.2% #17 1,899 0 9
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 1997 26–18 59.1% #37 1,830 0 10
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 1998 37–21 63.8% #32 1,874 0 12
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 1999 22–18 55.0% #60 1,802 0 13
33 — — — — — — — 2000 17–14 54.8% #82 1,718 0 14
34 — — — — — — — 2001 19–18 51.4% #82 1,695 0 14