H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Magnus Larsson H2H: 5-1

Greg Rusedski holds a 5–1 lead over Magnus Larsson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Magnus Larsson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2002 Nottingham quarterfinal 6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Magnus Larsson
SWE Age 56 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 2002* Nottingham ATP 250 QF Grass Greg Rusedski #38 6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-3 Magnus Larsson #146 Match data
Oct 28, 1999* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Greg Rusedski #6 (w/o) Magnus Larsson #104 Match data
Aug 17, 1998 Indianapolis ATP 250 R32 Hard Greg Rusedski #7 7-6(2) 6-3 Magnus Larsson #33 Match data
Nov 8, 1997* Stockholm ATP 250 QF Hard Greg Rusedski #5 (w/o) Magnus Larsson #26 Match data
Jul 17, 1997* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Clay Magnus Larsson #36 7-6(4) 6-7(2) 6-4 Greg Rusedski #25 Match data
Aug 14, 1996* New Haven ATP 250 R64 Hard Greg Rusedski #74 7-5 6-4 Magnus Larsson #60 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Magnus Larsson #1,422 #10 2,222 2,040 293 217 57.5% 0 0 1 0 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Magnus Larsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1988 2–2 50.0% #381 1,518 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1989 0–3 0.0% #145 1,469 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1990 15–9 62.5% #56 1,680 0 1
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1991 21–21 50.0% #61 1,718 0 1
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1992 27–19 58.7% #34 1,802 0 3
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1993 29–25 53.7% #39 1,820 0 3
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1994 36–21 63.2% #19 2,004 0 6
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1995 32–13 71.1% #17 1,932 0 6
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1996 26–23 53.1% #46 1,765 0 6
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 1997 38–21 64.4% #25 1,891 0 6
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 1998 19–16 54.3% #43 1,828 0 6
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 1999 16–18 47.1% #95 1,729 0 6
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2000 13–6 68.4% #75 1,770 0 7
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2001 10–10 50.0% #136 1,728 0 7
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 2002 8–8 50.0% #152 1,673 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #507 1,689 0 7