H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Magnus Norman H2H: 3-1

Greg Rusedski holds a 3–1 lead over Magnus Norman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on carpet, while Magnus Norman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 1999 Wimbledon third round 6-3 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Magnus Norman
SWE Age 50 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Greg Rusedski #12 6-3 6-4 7-5 Magnus Norman #60 Match data
Aug 27, 1998* Long Island ATP 250 R32 Hard Greg Rusedski #6 6-3 6-4 Magnus Norman #37 Match data
Oct 10, 1997* Vienna ATP 250 R16 Carpet Greg Rusedski #4 6-4 6-2 Magnus Norman #28 Match data
May 28, 1997* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Magnus Norman #65 6-3 6-2 3-6 4-6 9-7 Greg Rusedski #41 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Magnus Norman #500 #2 3,610 2,041 234 163 58.9% 0 1 0 0 11 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Magnus Norman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1992 0–1 0.0% #690 1,489 0 0
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1995 3–2 60.0% #170 1,542 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1996 13–10 56.5% #86 1,672 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1997 42–26 61.8% #22 1,822 0 1
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1998 24–28 46.2% #52 1,720 0 2
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1999 43–21 67.2% #15 1,890 0 7
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 2000 64–23 73.6% #4 1,885 0 12
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 2001 23–17 57.5% #49 1,751 0 12
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 2002 12–19 38.7% #107 1,673 0 12
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 2003 10–16 38.5% #125 1,595 0 12
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 — — — — — — —
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 — — — — — — —
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 — — — — — — —