H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Greg Rusedski vs Marc Kevin Goellner H2H: 2-1
Greg Rusedski holds a 2–1 lead over Marc Kevin Goellner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marc Kevin Goellner leads 1–0 on carpet, while Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 1998 Toulouse third round 7-6(5) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 55
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 1998* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Greg Rusedski | 7-6(5) 7-6(3) | Marc Kevin Goellner | Match data |
| Feb 26, 1998* | London | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marc Kevin Goellner | 5-7 7-5 6-4 | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
| May 25, 1994* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Greg Rusedski | 7-6(6) 6-3 7-6(3) | Marc Kevin Goellner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Marc Kevin Goellner | #1,172 | #26 | 1,072 | 1,841 | 152 | 188 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Greg Rusedski | Marc Kevin Goellner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #78 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #53 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 22–34 | 39.3% | #51 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 11–25 | 30.6% | #118 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #324 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #189 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 | 2001 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #176 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |