H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Mark Knowles H2H: 1-0

Greg Rusedski holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Knowles in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 1994 Indianapolis round of 64 7-6(4) 3-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Mark Knowles
BAH Age 54 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Greg Rusedski #59 7-6(4) 3-6 7-5 Mark Knowles #218 Match data Aug 17, 1994* R64 Indianapolis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,052 417 278 60.0% 0 1 1 3 10 15
Mark Knowles #1,400 #96 484 1,623 23 52 30.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Mark Knowles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% #728 1,484 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #430 1,449 0 0
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1991 2–3 40.0% #291 1,460 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,682 0 1 1992 1–1 50.0% #258 1,484 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1993 3–3 50.0% #173 1,525 0 0
22 1996 38–26 59.4% #48 1,816 0 3 1994 2–7 22.2% #231 1,509 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,941 0 5 1995 3–4 42.9% #139 1,549 0 0
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1996 10–17 37.0% #117 1,535 0 0
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,970 0 9 1997 0–5 0.0% #363 1,493 0 0
26 2000 19–20 48.7% #69 1,796 0 9 1998 2–3 40.0% #273 1,483 0 0
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,809 0 10 1999 0–3 0.0% #223 1,451 0 0
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,902 0 12 2000 0–2 0.0% #350 1,436 0 0
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,823 0 13 — — — — — — —
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,821 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,786 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,640 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Greg Rusedski Mark Knowles
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1992 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1991 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1992 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1995 23 15 38 60.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1993 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1996 19 15 34 55.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1998 34 11 45 75.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1996 2 9 11 18.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 1 5 80.0%
25 1999 25 10 35 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2000 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2002 24 11 35 68.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 14 13 27 51.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 158 383 58.7% 25 45 70 35.7% 82 35 117 70.1% 85 40 125 68.0% — 8 31 39 20.5% 2 8 10 20.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 600/695 of Greg Rusedski's and 65/71 of Mark Knowles's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Greg Rusedski Mark Knowles
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1992 4/4 9.8 7.0 51.6% 77.5% 36.6% 52.3% 35.2% 57.2% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 23/25 14.0 4.9 57.6% 82.3% 54.7% 68.5% 39.0% 70.5% 32.3% 1991 5/5 2.4 1.6 62.5% 68.6% 47.8% 56.2% 55.0% 60.2% 39.4%
20 1994 46/50 9.2 5.2 56.6% 78.6% 51.6% 59.6% 32.6% 66.8% 34.0% 1992 2/2 4.0 6.5 52.4% 78.2% 49.7% 83.3% 55.0% 64.9% 38.8%
21 1995 50/59 11.7 6.1 56.7% 81.6% 49.8% 64.1% 40.5% 67.8% 34.9% 1993 6/6 3.8 3.3 51.6% 75.1% 49.1% 56.8% 65.1% 62.4% 38.3%
22 1996 53/64 11.6 2.9 60.5% 81.7% 53.2% 57.4% 39.6% 70.7% 36.8% 1994 8/9 2.6 6.9 59.6% 65.0% 41.6% 46.5% 48.0% 55.5% 39.0%
23 1997 61/76 14.0 4.6 57.5% 85.1% 57.1% 67.5% 45.1% 73.2% 35.2% 1995 6/7 1.8 5.3 60.7% 63.3% 46.7% 46.2% 51.1% 56.4% 32.9%
24 1998 59/72 12.0 5.0 55.8% 82.2% 54.4% 68.1% 41.7% 69.8% 35.3% 1996 25/27 5.6 5.7 53.7% 71.0% 48.5% 58.3% 38.5% 60.4% 37.9%
25 1999 51/68 10.5 4.7 58.2% 80.2% 54.7% 62.4% 35.4% 69.4% 35.5% 1997 5/5 3.0 4.0 54.9% 54.9% 45.0% 51.2% 43.5% 50.0% 40.2%
26 2000 35/39 9.0 5.0 57.8% 76.0% 52.5% 67.6% 37.4% 66.1% 35.5% 1998 4/5 2.8 5.5 61.8% 67.3% 34.9% 59.2% 66.1% 54.8% 39.8%
27 2001 52/61 10.3 3.4 58.7% 80.6% 54.5% 60.6% 36.9% 69.8% 36.4% 1999 2/3 4.5 4.0 64.3% 58.9% 46.9% 38.9% 21.4% 54.0% 34.7%
28 2002 39/49 11.0 4.0 60.9% 79.5% 54.3% 71.1% 41.1% 69.6% 34.3% 2000 2/2 1.5 5.5 56.9% 57.1% 51.5% 35.4% 25.9% 54.5% 35.5%
29 2003 19/19 12.4 4.0 63.5% 78.9% 56.2% 72.5% 43.3% 70.5% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 39/39 11.2 5.6 60.0% 78.2% 53.7% 68.1% 45.0% 68.3% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 48/49 9.6 5.8 57.5% 77.2% 53.4% 69.9% 33.8% 67.0% 31.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 21/21 6.2 4.5 60.8% 66.8% 47.5% 53.1% 38.7% 59.3% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 600/695 11.0 4.7 58.3% 79.9% 53.5% 64.8% 39.2% 68.8% 34.6% — 65/75 3.9 5.1 56.5% 67.7% 46.5% 54.4% 46.2% 58.2% 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Greg Rusedski Mark Knowles
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1484 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.14
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1449 88.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.67 — — — +0.23
18 1992 1526 107.0 -1.85 +0.57 0.973 49.7% +36 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–0 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1751 140.1 +5.69 -3.01 1.097 51.2% -45 — -48 56.7% +0.22 10–5 (67%) 14–14 (50%) — +0.39 1991 1461 102.6 +0.62 -2.64 0.990 49.0% +33 — — 50.0% -0.63 — 1–0 — +0.38
20 1994 1683 135.7 +4.03 -2.97 1.022 50.1% -25 -116 +29 46.6% -0.07 8–14 (36%) 15–19 (44%) — -1.22 1992 1484 109.1 -0.44 +1.34 1.106 52.0% — — — 50.0% +1.00 — 0–1 — +0.08
21 1995 1699 145.1 +4.49 -2.03 1.085 51.6% +23 -70 +37 56.7% +0.38 8–11 (42%) 22–16 (58%) — -0.02 1993 1526 114.5 +0.34 +0.85 1.017 50.3% +6 — — 50.0% 0.00 0–2 1–1 — +0.13
22 1996 1816 150.0 +6.92 +0.08 1.258 53.0% +15 -174 -46 56.9% +0.43 12–11 (52%) 26–20 (57%) — -1.78 1994 1509 115.5 -3.12 +0.60 0.877 47.3% -8 — — 40.7% -0.78 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.25
23 1997 1942 156.9 +9.49 -0.70 1.316 53.9% +9 -283 -3 66.8% +0.94 16–12 (57%) 27–18 (60%) — -3.68 1995 1550 118.7 -1.39 -0.67 0.755 45.0% -34 — — 38.1% -1.05 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.33
24 1998 2012 159.3 +6.82 -1.21 1.168 52.2% +36 -417 -143 63.6% +0.73 16–5 (76%) 30–15 (67%) — -1.21 1996 1535 112.8 -1.69 -0.03 0.957 49.0% -18 -15 +77 42.5% -0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–9 (36%) — +2.14
25 1999 1971 155.1 +6.15 -1.39 1.158 52.0% +40 -346 -93 63.5% +0.81 12–9 (57%) 19–14 (58%) — -0.97 1997 1493 119.1 -2.58 +0.64 0.804 45.6% -15 — — 18.2% -2.09 0–2 0–2 — -0.32
26 2000 1796 149.4 +3.25 -1.02 1.047 50.8% +86 -203 +44 51.1% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 16–10 (62%) — -3.02 1998 1484 96.7 -2.46 -1.13 0.881 48.0% — — +134 20.0% -2.20 1–0 — — +0.87
27 2001 1810 149.1 +6.33 -0.53 1.203 52.7% +5 -205 +93 59.1% +0.65 6–5 (55%) 21–16 (57%) — -1.81 1999 1451 98.8 -0.82 -1.79 0.754 44.4% +7 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.26
28 2002 1902 150.0 +6.06 -1.57 1.129 51.6% +23 — -18 61.0% +0.69 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) — -2.14 2000 1437 100.7 -2.24 -1.34 0.780 45.5% — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.06
29 2003 1824 128.0 +5.26 -0.65 1.144 51.8% +15 — +122 56.0% +0.26 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.36 2001 1421 96.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 1821 132.1 +3.67 -2.78 1.017 50.5% -4 — +106 55.7% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 1787 139.4 +3.29 -2.83 0.958 49.7% -6 -261 +180 49.6% +0.03 14–3 (82%) 14–17 (45%) — -1.02 2003 1410 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 1641 131.5 -1.70 -3.52 0.764 46.0% +59 -130 — 29.8% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2053 153.7 +5.40 -1.57 1.110 51.5% +18 -222 +32 57.4% +0.42 138–102 (58%) 252–196 (56%) 107.0 -2.75 — 1623 115.1 -1.54 -0.20 0.906 48.1% -6 -15 +98 36.7% -0.88 8–17 (32%) 9–15 (38%) 94.9 +4.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.