H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Mark Philippoussis H2H: 3-3

Greg Rusedski and Mark Philippoussis are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 2–1 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2004 Sydney fourth round 6-3 1-6 6-4.

GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 16, 2004* Sydney ATP 250 R16 Hard Mark Philippoussis #10 6-3 1-6 6-4 Greg Rusedski #112 Match data
Jun 13, 2002* Queen's Club ATP 250 R32 Grass Mark Philippoussis #110 6-7(1) 7-6(3) 7-6(5) Greg Rusedski #38 Match data
Jan 18, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Greg Rusedski #25 7-6(7) 6-3 6-4 Mark Philippoussis #78 Match data
Jun 30, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Mark Philippoussis #11 2-6 7-6(4) 6-3 6-1 Greg Rusedski #12 Match data
Oct 5, 1997* Basel ATP 250 F Carpet Greg Rusedski #10 6-3 7-6(6) 7-6(3) Mark Philippoussis #21 Match data
Jun 25, 1997* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Greg Rusedski #27 7-6(6) 7-6(6) 6-3 Mark Philippoussis #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,022 287 190 60.2% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Mark Philippoussis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,764 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1996 31–22 58.5% #30 1,838 0 1
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,852 0 4
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,906 0 5
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,892 0 7
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 2000 40–21 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,803 0 9
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 2004 8–15 34.8% #109 1,669 0 10
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,659 0 10
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,732 0 11
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15