H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Greg Rusedski vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 2-0
Greg Rusedski holds a 2–0 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 1997 Nottingham fourth round 6-4 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 1997* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Greg Rusedski | 6-4 7-6(6) | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1997* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Greg Rusedski | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Greg Rusedski | Mark Woodforde | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 |