H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Greg Rusedski vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 4-1
Greg Rusedski holds a 4–1 lead over Martin Damm Sr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 3–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 1998 Split quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 1998* | Split | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Greg Rusedski | 6-1 6-4 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data |
| Feb 1, 1997* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Greg Rusedski | 7-5 6-3 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data |
| Oct 13, 1996* | Beijing | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Greg Rusedski | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1996* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Greg Rusedski | 6-3 7-6(4) | Martin Damm Sr | Match data |
| Apr 27, 1996* | Seoul | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Martin Damm Sr | 6-4 6-7(5) 7-5 | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Martin Damm Sr | — | — | — | 1,744 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Greg Rusedski | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |