H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Michael Chang H2H: 2-6

Michael Chang holds a 6–2 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 1997 San Jose quarterfinal 7-6(4) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 6
8 main draw meetings
Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 15, 1997* San Jose ATP 250 QF Hard Greg Rusedski #39 7-6(4) 6-4 Michael Chang #4 Match data
Oct 5, 1996* Singapore ATP 250 SF Carpet Michael Chang #2 7-6(5) 6-3 Greg Rusedski #84 Match data
Feb 11, 1995* San Jose ATP 250 QF Hard Michael Chang #6 7-6(6) 7-6(8) Greg Rusedski #91 Match data
Aug 11, 1994* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Michael Chang #7 6-3 6-3 Greg Rusedski #58 Match data
Apr 1, 1994* Osaka ATP 250 R16 Hard Michael Chang #8 6-3 7-5 Greg Rusedski #55 Match data
Oct 24, 1993* Beijing ATP 250 F Carpet Michael Chang #7 7-6(5) 6-7(6) 6-4 Greg Rusedski #77 Match data
Oct 16, 1993* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 QF Carpet Greg Rusedski #130 4-6 6-3 7-6(6) Michael Chang #7 Match data
Apr 3, 1993* Osaka ATP 250 QF Hard Michael Chang #9 6-2 4-6 7-6(1) Greg Rusedski #158 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Michael Chang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 — — — — — — —