H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Michael Chang H2H: 2-6

Michael Chang holds a 6–2 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 1997 San Jose quarterfinal 7-6(4) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 6
8 main draw meetings
Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Greg Rusedski #39 7-6(4) 6-4 Michael Chang #4 Match data Feb 15, 1997* QF San Jose World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Michael Chang #2 7-6(5) 6-3 Greg Rusedski #84 Match data Oct 5, 1996* SF Brisbane International World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Michael Chang #6 7-6(6) 7-6(8) Greg Rusedski #91 Match data Feb 11, 1995* QF San Jose ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Michael Chang #7 6-3 6-3 Greg Rusedski #58 Match data Aug 11, 1994* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Michael Chang #8 6-3 7-5 Greg Rusedski #55 Match data Apr 1, 1994* R16 Osaka ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Michael Chang #7 7-6(5) 6-7(6) 6-4 Greg Rusedski #77 Match data Oct 24, 1993* F China Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Greg Rusedski #130 4-6 6-3 7-6(6) Michael Chang #7 Match data Oct 16, 1993* QF Tokyo Indoor ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Michael Chang #9 6-2 4-6 7-6(1) Greg Rusedski #158 Match data Apr 3, 1993* QF Osaka ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,052 417 278 60.0% 0 1 1 3 10 15
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,113 649 305 68.0% 1 7 0 5 21 34

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Michael Chang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,977 1 3
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,919 1 4
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,003 1 5
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,682 0 1 1992 58–23 71.6% #6 1,966 1 8
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13
22 1996 38–26 59.4% #48 1,816 0 3 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,006 1 19
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,941 0 5 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,011 1 23
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,991 1 26
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,970 0 9 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,911 1 31
26 2000 19–20 48.7% #69 1,796 0 9 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,848 1 33
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,809 0 10 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,790 1 33
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,902 0 12 2000 42–26 61.8% #32 1,807 1 34
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,823 0 13 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,699 1 34
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,821 0 14 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,624 1 34
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,786 0 15 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,640 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Greg Rusedski Michael Chang
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 13 8 21 61.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 0 5 100.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 20 8 28 71.4% 12 2 14 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
18 1992 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 19 8 27 70.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3%
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1991 24 11 35 68.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 5 20 75.0%
20 1994 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1992 40 8 48 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9%
21 1995 23 15 38 60.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1993 43 10 53 81.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 6 18 66.7%
22 1996 19 15 34 55.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 1994 35 10 45 77.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 19 6 25 76.0%
23 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 1995 31 10 41 75.6% 14 2 16 87.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0%
24 1998 34 11 45 75.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1996 48 9 57 84.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
25 1999 25 10 35 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1997 42 9 51 82.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 2000 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 19 9 28 67.9% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
27 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 21 17 38 55.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0%
28 2002 24 11 35 68.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2000 27 16 43 62.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2004 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 2002 5 13 18 27.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 2005 14 13 27 51.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 158 383 58.7% 25 45 70 35.7% 82 35 117 70.1% 85 40 125 68.0% — 404 172 576 70.1% 98 52 150 65.3% 30 25 55 54.5% 117 56 173 67.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 600/695 of Greg Rusedski's and 666/795 of Michael Chang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Greg Rusedski Michael Chang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1992 4/4 9.8 7.0 51.6% 77.5% 36.6% 52.3% 35.2% 57.2% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 23/25 14.0 4.9 57.6% 82.3% 54.7% 68.5% 39.0% 70.5% 32.3% 1991 52/67 1.9 1.4 56.2% 68.0% 54.6% 55.2% 47.7% 61.8% 43.2%
20 1994 46/50 9.2 5.2 56.6% 78.6% 51.6% 59.6% 32.6% 66.8% 34.0% 1992 66/81 2.0 1.4 63.8% 68.8% 54.8% 55.7% 47.9% 63.5% 45.0%
21 1995 50/59 11.7 6.1 56.7% 81.6% 49.8% 64.1% 40.5% 67.8% 34.9% 1993 67/83 3.1 2.0 58.4% 69.7% 56.4% 64.2% 45.7% 64.3% 43.1%
22 1996 53/64 11.6 2.9 60.5% 81.7% 53.2% 57.4% 39.6% 70.7% 36.8% 1994 71/85 4.3 2.0 56.1% 73.8% 56.4% 58.8% 46.7% 66.1% 43.7%
23 1997 61/76 14.0 4.6 57.5% 85.1% 57.1% 67.5% 45.1% 73.2% 35.2% 1995 72/84 5.8 2.1 54.7% 76.9% 55.3% 60.0% 43.9% 66.9% 43.1%
24 1998 59/72 12.0 5.0 55.8% 82.2% 54.4% 68.1% 41.7% 69.8% 35.3% 1996 72/82 6.4 2.5 50.2% 77.2% 53.5% 61.0% 49.3% 65.3% 44.5%
25 1999 51/68 10.5 4.7 58.2% 80.2% 54.7% 62.4% 35.4% 69.4% 35.5% 1997 59/71 5.9 2.7 52.1% 74.6% 53.9% 63.7% 46.3% 64.7% 43.2%
26 2000 35/39 9.0 5.0 57.8% 76.0% 52.5% 67.6% 37.4% 66.1% 35.5% 1998 43/51 6.2 2.0 54.3% 74.8% 52.5% 61.7% 47.0% 64.6% 41.1%
27 2001 52/61 10.3 3.4 58.7% 80.6% 54.5% 60.6% 36.9% 69.8% 36.4% 1999 41/49 4.2 1.5 56.0% 72.0% 51.8% 56.3% 45.2% 63.0% 40.3%
28 2002 39/49 11.0 4.0 60.9% 79.5% 54.3% 71.1% 41.1% 69.6% 34.3% 2000 56/68 3.4 1.9 55.8% 70.2% 51.0% 59.6% 49.8% 61.7% 41.4%
29 2003 19/19 12.4 4.0 63.5% 78.9% 56.2% 72.5% 43.3% 70.5% 33.7% 2001 34/37 3.7 1.6 57.9% 69.7% 47.4% 57.7% 39.3% 60.1% 40.1%
30 2004 39/39 11.2 5.6 60.0% 78.2% 53.7% 68.1% 45.0% 68.3% 32.2% 2002 21/25 4.1 1.8 55.0% 70.1% 48.0% 55.0% 42.2% 60.2% 35.1%
31 2005 48/49 9.6 5.8 57.5% 77.2% 53.4% 69.9% 33.8% 67.0% 31.6% 2003 12/12 4.6 1.6 56.2% 69.1% 46.1% 31.4% 34.7% 59.2% 32.6%
32 2006 21/21 6.2 4.5 60.8% 66.8% 47.5% 53.1% 38.7% 59.3% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 600/695 11.0 4.7 58.3% 79.9% 53.5% 64.8% 39.2% 68.8% 34.6% — 666/954 4.3 1.9 55.9% 72.4% 53.6% 59.0% 46.2% 63.9% 42.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Greg Rusedski Michael Chang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1559 121.3 — — — — +34 — — 52.2% +0.09 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.24
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1842 146.2 — — — — +2 -249 -283 59.2% +0.61 8–5 (62%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.45
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1978 162.9 — — — — -29 -75 -313 68.9% +1.37 8–6 (57%) 8–5 (62%) — -2.14
18 1992 1526 107.0 -1.85 +0.57 0.973 49.7% +36 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–0 — +0.33 1990 1920 158.6 — — — — +10 -23 -163 59.6% +0.75 11–6 (65%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.26
19 1993 1751 140.1 +5.69 -3.01 1.097 51.2% -45 — -48 56.7% +0.22 10–5 (67%) 14–14 (50%) — +0.39 1991 2003 160.6 +1.22 +4.46 1.132 52.5% +33 -67 -258 61.4% +0.91 18–7 (72%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.51
20 1994 1683 135.7 +4.03 -2.97 1.022 50.1% -25 -116 +29 46.6% -0.07 8–14 (36%) 15–19 (44%) — -1.22 1992 1966 166.2 +1.99 +7.08 1.233 54.0% +51 -96 — 65.1% +1.24 16–8 (67%) 8–18 (31%) — -1.65
21 1995 1699 145.1 +4.49 -2.03 1.085 51.6% +23 -70 +37 56.7% +0.38 8–11 (42%) 22–16 (58%) — -0.02 1993 1992 160.0 +2.60 +5.19 1.207 53.4% +28 -138 -270 66.4% +1.22 23–10 (70%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.44
22 1996 1816 150.0 +6.92 +0.08 1.258 53.0% +15 -174 -46 56.9% +0.43 12–11 (52%) 26–20 (57%) — -1.78 1994 2007 157.5 +3.82 +5.50 1.290 54.5% -9 -130 -197 71.3% +1.45 14–8 (64%) 19–7 (73%) — +0.39
23 1997 1942 156.9 +9.49 -0.70 1.316 53.9% +9 -283 -3 66.8% +0.94 16–12 (57%) 27–18 (60%) — -3.68 1995 2011 165.8 +4.79 +5.90 1.302 54.6% +1 +38 — 70.0% +1.41 16–5 (76%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.91
24 1998 2012 159.3 +6.82 -1.21 1.168 52.2% +36 -417 -143 63.6% +0.73 16–5 (76%) 30–15 (67%) — -1.21 1996 1992 167.8 +3.39 +6.79 1.284 54.8% +58 -22 — 70.3% +1.62 16–3 (84%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.94
25 1999 1971 155.1 +6.15 -1.39 1.158 52.0% +40 -346 -93 63.5% +0.81 12–9 (57%) 19–14 (58%) — -0.97 1997 1911 157.1 +2.72 +5.34 1.224 53.9% +68 +21 -176 66.3% +1.37 17–7 (71%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.71
26 2000 1796 149.4 +3.25 -1.02 1.047 50.8% +86 -203 +44 51.1% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 16–10 (62%) — -3.02 1998 1849 144.8 +1.95 +2.83 1.163 52.9% +24 +87 — 65.1% +1.02 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — +2.82
27 2001 1810 149.1 +6.33 -0.53 1.203 52.7% +5 -205 +93 59.1% +0.65 6–5 (55%) 21–16 (57%) — -1.81 1999 1791 141.4 +0.54 +2.18 1.090 51.5% +20 +46 — 54.0% +0.38 9–9 (50%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.91
28 2002 1902 150.0 +6.06 -1.57 1.129 51.6% +23 — -18 61.0% +0.69 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) — -2.14 2000 1807 140.0 -0.26 +3.59 1.080 51.7% -11 -12 -72 56.2% +0.47 15–9 (63%) 13–10 (57%) — +0.86
29 2003 1824 128.0 +5.26 -0.65 1.144 51.8% +15 — +122 56.0% +0.26 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.36 2001 1699 128.0 -1.43 +1.98 1.006 49.8% -10 +24 -7 44.9% -0.13 4–4 (50%) 3–9 (25%) — +0.59
30 2004 1821 132.1 +3.67 -2.78 1.017 50.5% -4 — +106 55.7% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) — -0.15 2002 1624 130.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.882 48.0% +20 +41 +34 35.3% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.72
31 2005 1787 139.4 +3.29 -2.83 0.958 49.7% -6 -261 +180 49.6% +0.03 14–3 (82%) 14–17 (45%) — -1.02 2003 1551 127.1 -0.91 -1.10 0.800 46.1% +26 — — 24.1% -1.59 0–2 0–1 — -0.78
32 2006 1641 131.5 -1.70 -3.52 0.764 46.0% +59 -130 — 29.8% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2053 153.7 +5.40 -1.57 1.110 51.5% +18 -222 +32 57.4% +0.42 138–102 (58%) 252–196 (56%) 107.0 -2.75 — 2114 161.6 +2.11 +4.69 1.178 53.1% +21 -33 -160 62.8% +0.99 188–106 (64%) 147–149 (50%) 98.2 -0.36

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.