H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 1-2

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 2–1 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2006 Canada Masters second round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 9, 2006* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #45 6-4 6-2 Greg Rusedski #72 Match data
Mar 21, 2006* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Greg Rusedski #48 6-3 6-1 Mikhail Youzhny #42 Match data
Oct 30, 2004* St. Petersburg ATP 250 SF Carpet Mikhail Youzhny #31 3-6 6-3 6-4 Greg Rusedski #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 — — — — — — — 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 — — — — — — — 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10