H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Nicklas Kulti H2H: 3-1

Greg Rusedski holds a 3–1 lead over Nicklas Kulti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 1997 Stockholm third round 7-6(3) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Nicklas Kulti
SWE Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 6, 1997* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Greg Rusedski #5 7-6(3) 6-4 Nicklas Kulti #128 Match data
Jan 20, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Greg Rusedski #103 7-6(3) 4-6 2-6 6-3 Nicklas Kulti #138 Match data
Jun 22, 1994* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Greg Rusedski #41 6-3 6-4 6-2 Nicklas Kulti #82 Match data
Jan 7, 1994* Adelaide ATP 250 R16 Hard Nicklas Kulti #46 7-6(2) 6-3 Greg Rusedski #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Nicklas Kulti #977 #32 826 1,819 150 179 45.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Nicklas Kulti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 3–4 42.9% #176 1,543 0 0
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1989 7–9 43.8% #118 1,581 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1990 15–11 57.7% #51 1,745 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1991 18–24 42.9% #80 1,656 0 1
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1992 18–23 43.9% #79 1,611 0 1
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1993 27–24 52.9% #46 1,690 0 2
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1994 20–26 43.5% #99 1,675 0 2
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1995 6–8 42.9% #165 1,638 0 2
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1996 14–16 46.7% #64 1,636 0 3
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1997 9–17 34.6% #154 1,578 0 3
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 1998 3–3 50.0% #290 1,602 0 3
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 1999 10–9 52.6% #118 1,632 0 3
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2000 0–5 0.0% #421 1,558 0 3
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 — — — — — — —