H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 5-4

Greg Rusedski holds a 5–4 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 3–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 2–2 on carpet. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2005 Indianapolis quarterfinal 3-6 7-6(4) 6-4.

GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
5 4
9 main draw meetings
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 18, 2005 Indianapolis ATP 250 QF Hard Greg Rusedski #40 3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 Nicolas Kiefer #26 Match data
Jul 17, 2004* Los Angeles ATP 250 QF Hard Nicolas Kiefer #32 6-1 6-4 Greg Rusedski #98 Match data
Oct 17, 1999* Vienna ATP 250 F Hard Greg Rusedski #7 6-7(5) 2-6 6-3 7-5 6-4 Nicolas Kiefer #11 Match data
Oct 9, 1999* Basel ATP 250 QF Carpet Nicolas Kiefer #12 2-6 7-6(4) 6-3 Greg Rusedski #8 Match data
Mar 20, 1999* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #30 4-6 7-5 6-2 Greg Rusedski #13 Match data
Feb 18, 1999* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Carpet Greg Rusedski #9 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 Nicolas Kiefer #35 Match data
Nov 5, 1998* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Greg Rusedski #13 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Kiefer #34 Match data
Oct 3, 1998* Toulouse ATP 250 SF Hard Greg Rusedski #14 6-4 6-1 Nicolas Kiefer #31 Match data
Oct 23, 1997* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Nicolas Kiefer #34 5-7 6-2 6-4 Greg Rusedski #5 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6