H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 0-4

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 4–0 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2006 Rotterdam fourth round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 24, 2006* Rotterdam ATP 250 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #6 6-4 6-1 Greg Rusedski #43 Match data
Nov 3, 2005* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Nikolay Davydenko #8 6-2 6-2 Greg Rusedski #38 Match data
Oct 17, 2004* Moscow ATP 250 F Carpet Nikolay Davydenko #43 3-6 6-3 7-5 Greg Rusedski #81 Match data
May 28, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #33 6-3 7-5 6-2 Greg Rusedski #70 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Nikolay Davydenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 — — — — — — — 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21