H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Greg Rusedski vs Pat Cash H2H: 0-1
Pat Cash holds a 1–0 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pat Cash leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pat Cash won the 1995 Copenhagen fourth round 3-6 7-6(6) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 1995* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Pat Cash | 3-6 7-6(6) 7-6(3) | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Pat Cash | #734 | #4 | 658 | 2,098 | 210 | 134 | 61.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Greg Rusedski | Pat Cash | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #10 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #67 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #24 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #7 | 2,022 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 23–9 | 71.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 1 | 5 |
| 24 | 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,927 | 1 | 5 |
| 25 | 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #81 | 1,872 | 1 | 6 |
| 26 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #108 | 1,806 | 1 | 6 |
| 27 | 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #203 | 1,817 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,767 | 1 | 6 |
| 30 | 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 | 1995 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #250 | 1,677 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,616 | 1 | 6 |
| 32 | 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #379 | 1,574 | 1 | 6 |