H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Patrick Rafter H2H: 3-7

Patrick Rafter holds a 7–3 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Patrick Rafter leads 7–1 on hard courts, while Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Patrick Rafter won the 2001 Cincinnati Open quarterfinal 5-7 7-6(5) 6-4.

GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 7
10 main draw meetings
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patrick Rafter #7 5-7 7-6(5) 6-4 Greg Rusedski #36 Match data Aug 12, 2001* QF Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Patrick Rafter #11 6-3 6-2 Greg Rusedski #41 Match data Mar 14, 2001* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Greg Rusedski #13 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 6-4 Patrick Rafter #3 Match data Oct 31, 1998* R16 Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Greg Rusedski #17 6-3 7-6(3) Patrick Rafter #2 Match data Oct 17, 1998* QF Vienna Open ATP Championship Series modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Patrick Rafter #3 6-4 7-5 Greg Rusedski #6 Match data Aug 29, 1998* SF Long Island ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Patrick Rafter #3 4-6 6-3 6-4 Greg Rusedski #5 Match data Nov 10, 1997 RR ATP Finals ATP Finals Hard
Patrick Rafter #3 6-3 6-2 4-6 7-5 Greg Rusedski #11 Match data Sep 8, 1997* F US Open Grand Slam Hard
Patrick Rafter #18 7-5 4-6 6-3 Greg Rusedski #25 Match data Aug 16, 1997* SF New Haven Championship Series modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Greg Rusedski #44 4-6 7-5 6-3 Patrick Rafter #17 Match data Jun 14, 1997* QF Queen's Club Championships World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Patrick Rafter #139 4-6 6-0 6-1 Greg Rusedski #127 Match data Aug 18, 1993* R64 Indianapolis ATP Championship Series modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,052 417 278 60.0% 0 1 1 3 10 15
Patrick Rafter #224 #1 3,673 2,105 333 178 65.2% 2 2 0 1 6 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Patrick Rafter
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1991 0–1 0.0% #293 1,495 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1992 0–3 0.0% #243 1,456 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,682 0 1 1993 11–11 50.0% #66 1,621 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1994 43–26 62.3% #20 1,804 0 1
22 1996 38–26 59.4% #48 1,816 0 3 1995 29–23 55.8% #66 1,778 0 1
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,941 0 5 1996 25–20 55.6% #62 1,764 0 1
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1997 63–26 70.8% #2 2,030 1 2
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,970 0 9 1998 58–20 74.4% #4 2,011 2 8
26 2000 19–20 48.7% #69 1,796 0 9 1999 31–16 66.0% #16 1,961 2 9
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,809 0 10 2000 31–17 64.6% #15 1,880 2 10
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,902 0 12 2001 42–15 73.7% #7 1,988 2 11
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,823 0 13
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,821 0 14
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,786 0 15
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,640 0 15

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Greg Rusedski Patrick Rafter
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1992 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1994 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1995 23 15 38 60.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1994 27 14 41 65.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 6 11 45.5%
22 1996 19 15 34 55.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 1995 21 11 32 65.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 1996 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1998 34 11 45 75.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1997 40 17 57 70.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
25 1999 25 10 35 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1998 40 10 50 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 2000 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 13 11 24 54.2% 7 3 10 70.0% 11 2 13 84.6%
27 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 13 10 23 56.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
28 2002 24 11 35 68.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2001 33 11 44 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0%
29 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
30 2004 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 2 9 77.8%
31 2005 14 13 27 51.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
32 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 225 158 383 58.7% 25 45 70 35.7% 82 35 117 70.1% 85 40 125 68.0% 204 103 307 66.4% 28 28 56 50.0% 66 23 89 74.2% 35 24 59 59.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 600/695 of Greg Rusedski's and 436/511 of Patrick Rafter's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Greg Rusedski Patrick Rafter
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1992 4/4 9.8 7.0 51.6% 77.5% 36.6% 52.3% 35.2% 57.2% 41.6% 1991 1/1 2.0 0.0 53.4% 51.6% 44.4% 44.4% 100.0% 48.3% 26.2%
19 1993 23/25 14.0 4.9 57.6% 82.3% 54.7% 68.5% 39.0% 70.5% 32.3% 1992 2/3 3.5 6.0 53.5% 65.1% 45.6% 60.3% 54.2% 56.1% 36.1%
20 1994 46/50 9.2 5.2 56.6% 78.6% 51.6% 59.6% 32.6% 66.8% 34.0% 1993 21/22 6.0 4.7 59.8% 73.3% 46.8% 64.6% 48.0% 62.6% 36.2%
21 1995 50/59 11.7 6.1 56.7% 81.6% 49.8% 64.1% 40.5% 67.8% 34.9% 1994 61/69 8.1 4.0 59.7% 75.1% 50.4% 64.3% 40.3% 65.1% 34.8%
22 1996 53/64 11.6 2.9 60.5% 81.7% 53.2% 57.4% 39.6% 70.7% 36.8% 1995 47/52 6.7 4.1 58.5% 73.5% 49.2% 60.2% 37.0% 63.4% 35.5%
23 1997 61/76 14.0 4.6 57.5% 85.1% 57.1% 67.5% 45.1% 73.2% 35.2% 1996 39/45 6.2 3.5 57.5% 77.3% 54.7% 62.2% 40.1% 67.4% 38.4%
24 1998 59/72 12.0 5.0 55.8% 82.2% 54.4% 68.1% 41.7% 69.8% 35.3% 1997 74/89 6.8 4.1 60.3% 76.0% 53.6% 59.2% 41.4% 67.1% 38.9%
25 1999 51/68 10.5 4.7 58.2% 80.2% 54.7% 62.4% 35.4% 69.4% 35.5% 1998 65/78 6.7 3.0 65.0% 77.4% 55.2% 64.0% 40.8% 69.5% 40.1%
26 2000 35/39 9.0 5.0 57.8% 76.0% 52.5% 67.6% 37.4% 66.1% 35.5% 1999 41/47 6.9 3.0 65.2% 77.1% 52.1% 52.9% 43.7% 68.6% 39.4%
27 2001 52/61 10.3 3.4 58.7% 80.6% 54.5% 60.6% 36.9% 69.8% 36.4% 2000 37/48 6.7 2.9 64.2% 77.7% 56.2% 63.9% 35.3% 69.9% 35.8%
28 2002 39/49 11.0 4.0 60.9% 79.5% 54.3% 71.1% 41.1% 69.6% 34.3% 2001 48/57 8.5 3.7 65.0% 77.5% 54.5% 61.8% 46.3% 69.3% 38.0%
29 2003 19/19 12.4 4.0 63.5% 78.9% 56.2% 72.5% 43.3% 70.5% 33.7% —/—
30 2004 39/39 11.2 5.6 60.0% 78.2% 53.7% 68.1% 45.0% 68.3% 32.2% —/—
31 2005 48/49 9.6 5.8 57.5% 77.2% 53.4% 69.9% 33.8% 67.0% 31.6% —/—
32 2006 21/21 6.2 4.5 60.8% 66.8% 47.5% 53.1% 38.7% 59.3% 31.1% —/—
Career 600/695 11.0 4.7 58.3% 79.9% 53.5% 64.8% 39.2% 68.8% 34.6% 436/511 7.0 3.7 61.7% 76.1% 52.8% 61.3% 41.3% 67.1% 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Greg Rusedski Patrick Rafter
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1992 1526 107.0 -1.85 +0.57 0.973 49.7% +36 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–0 +0.33 1991 1496 102.9 +2.28 -2.79 0.506 39.0% 0.0% -3.50 -0.17
19 1993 1751 140.1 +5.69 -3.01 1.097 51.2% -45 -48 56.7% +0.22 10–5 (67%) 14–14 (50%) +0.39 1992 1457 100.0 -2.19 +1.72 0.823 46.7% 22.2% -2.00 0–1 0–1 +0.25
20 1994 1683 135.7 +4.03 -2.97 1.022 50.1% -25 -116 +29 46.6% -0.07 8–14 (36%) 15–19 (44%) -1.22 1993 1622 136.3 +1.15 -0.18 0.967 49.7% -9 -4 50.0% -0.20 5–3 (63%) 6–2 (75%) +0.35
21 1995 1699 145.1 +4.49 -2.03 1.085 51.6% +23 -70 +37 56.7% +0.38 8–11 (42%) 22–16 (58%) -0.02 1994 1804 145.1 +3.43 -2.20 0.997 50.2% -27 -159 -76 58.6% +0.21 16–12 (57%) 23–10 (70%) -0.58
22 1996 1816 150.0 +6.92 +0.08 1.258 53.0% +15 -174 -46 56.9% +0.43 12–11 (52%) 26–20 (57%) -1.78 1995 1779 148.5 +2.26 -1.35 0.971 49.8% +63 -150 -102 52.2% +0.07 12–6 (67%) 14–11 (56%) -0.96
23 1997 1942 156.9 +9.49 -0.70 1.316 53.9% +9 -283 -3 66.8% +0.94 16–12 (57%) 27–18 (60%) -3.68 1996 1764 147.3 +4.50 +1.21 1.177 52.7% +12 -147 +37 57.0% +0.89 4–6 (40%) 5–13 (28%) -0.78
24 1998 2012 159.3 +6.82 -1.21 1.168 52.2% +36 -417 -143 63.6% +0.73 16–5 (76%) 30–15 (67%) -1.21 1997 2031 163.0 +5.33 +2.03 1.183 52.9% +9 -197 -179 62.0% +0.89 24–5 (83%) 20–22 (48%) -3.40
25 1999 1971 155.1 +6.15 -1.39 1.158 52.0% +40 -346 -93 63.5% +0.81 12–9 (57%) 19–14 (58%) -0.97 1998 2011 157.8 +6.57 +2.62 1.316 54.2% +18 -246 -117 66.8% +1.21 16–5 (76%) 23–19 (55%) +0.93
26 2000 1796 149.4 +3.25 -1.02 1.047 50.8% +86 -203 +44 51.1% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 16–10 (62%) -3.02 1999 1961 149.8 +5.69 +2.07 1.255 53.4% -61 -140 +14 65.8% +1.21 4–4 (50%) 12–14 (46%) -0.61
27 2001 1810 149.1 +6.33 -0.53 1.203 52.7% +5 -205 +93 59.1% +0.65 6–5 (55%) 21–16 (57%) -1.81 2000 1880 143.7 +6.33 -0.70 1.186 52.5% -46 -112 +237 62.6% +0.90 7–6 (54%) 12–15 (44%) -0.12
28 2002 1902 150.0 +6.06 -1.57 1.129 51.6% +23 -18 61.0% +0.69 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) -2.14 2001 1989 159.0 +6.46 +1.48 1.241 53.4% -2 +117 69.0% +1.14 9–7 (56%) 17–8 (68%) -0.75
29 2003 1824 128.0 +5.26 -0.65 1.144 51.8% +15 +122 56.0% +0.26 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) -1.36
30 2004 1821 132.1 +3.67 -2.78 1.017 50.5% -4 +106 55.7% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) -0.15
31 2005 1787 139.4 +3.29 -2.83 0.958 49.7% -6 -261 +180 49.6% +0.03 14–3 (82%) 14–17 (45%) -1.02
32 2006 1641 131.5 -1.70 -3.52 0.764 46.0% +59 -130 29.8% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–6 (33%) -1.33
Career 2053 153.7 +5.40 -1.57 1.110 51.5% +18 -222 +32 57.4% +0.42 138–102 (58%) 252–196 (56%) 107.0 -2.75 2105 157.4 +4.84 +0.68 1.144 52.2% 0 -164 +17 61.2% +0.74 97–55 (64%) 132–115 (53%) 108.1 -1.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.