H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Greg Rusedski vs Richey Reneberg H2H: 3-0
Greg Rusedski holds a 3–0 lead over Richey Reneberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 1998 Rotterdam fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 1998* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Greg Rusedski | 6-3 6-2 | Richey Reneberg | Match data |
| Jul 2, 1997* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Greg Rusedski | 7-6(2) 6-4 7-6(4) | Richey Reneberg | Match data |
| Feb 9, 1995* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Greg Rusedski | 6-3 6-4 | Richey Reneberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Richey Reneberg | #867 | #20 | 1,333 | 1,923 | 305 | 261 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Greg Rusedski | Richey Reneberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #337 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #79 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #128 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #27 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 | 1992 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #34 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 | 1995 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 | 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,682 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #202 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #573 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |