H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 2-1

Greg Rusedski holds a 2–1 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2002 Miami Masters first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Sargis Sargsian
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 19, 2002* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Greg Rusedski #38 6-3 6-4 Sargis Sargsian #68 Match data
Sep 14, 2000* Tashkent ATP 250 R32 Hard Greg Rusedski #38 6-3 7-5 Sargis Sargsian #75 Match data
Jun 12, 1999* Queen's Club ATP 250 QF Grass Sargis Sargsian #74 6-2 6-4 Greg Rusedski #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 155 205 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Sargis Sargsian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1996 3–5 37.5% #104 1,569 0 0
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,674 0 1
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,623 0 1
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,637 0 1
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 2000 15–25 37.5% #94 1,584 0 1
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,628 0 1
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,650 0 1
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2004 17–26 39.5% #75 1,699 0 1
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,588 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1