H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Greg Rusedski vs Slava Dosedel H2H: 0-2
Slava Dosedel holds a 2–0 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Slava Dosedel leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 2000 Roland Garros first round 6-3 7-6(10) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2000* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-3 7-6(10) 7-6(4) | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
| Apr 19, 2000* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-4 6-7(3) 6-1 | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Greg Rusedski | Slava Dosedel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 |
| 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 | 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 | 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 |
| 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |