H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Tim Henman H2H: 2-8

Tim Henman holds an 8–2 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 6–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2006 US Open round of 128 7-6(4) 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 8
10 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #62 7-6(4) 6-2 6-3 Greg Rusedski #136 Match data Aug 30, 2006* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Tim Henman #9 7-6(3) 6-4 Greg Rusedski #45 Match data May 12, 2005* R32 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Tim Henman #7 4-6 7-6(7) 6-4 Greg Rusedski #46 Match data Feb 24, 2005* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Tim Henman #8 6-4 6-3 1-6 6-3 Greg Rusedski #25 Match data Jan 20, 2002* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Tim Henman #9 6-4 6-4 Greg Rusedski #31 Match data Jan 5, 2002* QF Adelaide International ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Tim Henman #10 6-2 7-6(4) Greg Rusedski #69 Match data Jan 4, 2001* R32 Adelaide International ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Tim Henman #7 6-4 2-6 6-4 Greg Rusedski #10 Match data Mar 13, 1999* R16 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Greg Rusedski #11 6-2 6-4 Tim Henman #9 Match data Nov 23, 1998 RR ATP Finals ATP Finals Hard
Greg Rusedski #4 6-4 6-4 Tim Henman #21 Match data Oct 11, 1997* SF Vienna Open Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Tim Henman #26 7-6(2) 7-5 Greg Rusedski #53 Match data Oct 18, 1996* R16 Ostrava World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,052 417 278 60.0% 0 1 1 3 10 15
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,682 0 1 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0
22 1996 38–26 59.4% #48 1,816 0 3 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,941 0 5 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,970 0 9 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6
26 2000 19–20 48.7% #69 1,796 0 9 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,809 0 10 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,902 0 12 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,823 0 13 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,821 0 14 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,786 0 15 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,640 0 15 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Greg Rusedski Tim Henman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1992 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 1994 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1995 23 15 38 60.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4%
22 1996 19 15 34 55.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
23 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 1998 34 11 45 75.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
25 1999 25 10 35 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2000 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2002 24 11 35 68.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9%
29 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2004 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2005 14 13 27 51.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
Career — 225 158 383 58.7% 25 45 70 35.7% 82 35 117 70.1% 85 40 125 68.0% — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 600/695 of Greg Rusedski's and 644/732 of Tim Henman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Greg Rusedski Tim Henman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1992 4/4 9.8 7.0 51.6% 77.5% 36.6% 52.3% 35.2% 57.2% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 23/25 14.0 4.9 57.6% 82.3% 54.7% 68.5% 39.0% 70.5% 32.3% 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4%
20 1994 46/50 9.2 5.2 56.6% 78.6% 51.6% 59.6% 32.6% 66.8% 34.0% 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7%
21 1995 50/59 11.7 6.1 56.7% 81.6% 49.8% 64.1% 40.5% 67.8% 34.9% 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7%
22 1996 53/64 11.6 2.9 60.5% 81.7% 53.2% 57.4% 39.6% 70.7% 36.8% 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3%
23 1997 61/76 14.0 4.6 57.5% 85.1% 57.1% 67.5% 45.1% 73.2% 35.2% 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3%
24 1998 59/72 12.0 5.0 55.8% 82.2% 54.4% 68.1% 41.7% 69.8% 35.3% 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2%
25 1999 51/68 10.5 4.7 58.2% 80.2% 54.7% 62.4% 35.4% 69.4% 35.5% 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2%
26 2000 35/39 9.0 5.0 57.8% 76.0% 52.5% 67.6% 37.4% 66.1% 35.5% 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8%
27 2001 52/61 10.3 3.4 58.7% 80.6% 54.5% 60.6% 36.9% 69.8% 36.4% 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8%
28 2002 39/49 11.0 4.0 60.9% 79.5% 54.3% 71.1% 41.1% 69.6% 34.3% 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5%
29 2003 19/19 12.4 4.0 63.5% 78.9% 56.2% 72.5% 43.3% 70.5% 33.7% 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1%
30 2004 39/39 11.2 5.6 60.0% 78.2% 53.7% 68.1% 45.0% 68.3% 32.2% 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2%
31 2005 48/49 9.6 5.8 57.5% 77.2% 53.4% 69.9% 33.8% 67.0% 31.6% 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9%
32 2006 21/21 6.2 4.5 60.8% 66.8% 47.5% 53.1% 38.7% 59.3% 31.1% 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5%
Career — 600/695 11.0 4.7 58.3% 79.9% 53.5% 64.8% 39.2% 68.8% 34.6% — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Greg Rusedski Tim Henman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1992 1526 107.0 -1.85 +0.57 0.973 49.7% +36 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–0 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1751 140.1 +5.69 -3.01 1.097 51.2% -45 — -48 56.7% +0.22 10–5 (67%) 14–14 (50%) 108.0 +0.39 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33
20 1994 1683 135.7 +4.03 -2.97 1.022 50.1% -25 -116 +29 46.6% -0.07 8–14 (36%) 15–19 (44%) 96.1 -1.22 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 101.9 -0.04
21 1995 1699 145.1 +4.49 -2.03 1.085 51.6% +23 -70 +37 56.7% +0.38 8–11 (42%) 22–16 (58%) 101.1 -0.02 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) 102.6 -0.81
22 1996 1816 150.0 +6.92 +0.08 1.258 53.0% +15 -174 -46 56.9% +0.43 12–11 (52%) 26–20 (57%) 103.7 -1.78 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) 105.8 +0.85
23 1997 1942 156.9 +9.49 -0.70 1.316 53.9% +9 -283 -3 66.8% +0.94 16–12 (57%) 27–18 (60%) 107.0 -3.68 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) 104.5 -1.62
24 1998 2012 159.3 +6.82 -1.21 1.168 52.2% +36 -417 -143 63.6% +0.73 16–5 (76%) 30–15 (67%) 110.1 -1.21 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) 95.6 +0.72
25 1999 1971 155.1 +6.15 -1.39 1.158 52.0% +40 -346 -93 63.5% +0.81 12–9 (57%) 19–14 (58%) 99.1 -0.97 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) 100.3 +0.25
26 2000 1796 149.4 +3.25 -1.02 1.047 50.8% +86 -203 +44 51.1% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 16–10 (62%) 95.3 -3.02 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) 96.3 +2.30
27 2001 1810 149.1 +6.33 -0.53 1.203 52.7% +5 -205 +93 59.1% +0.65 6–5 (55%) 21–16 (57%) 101.3 -1.81 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) 94.1 +0.21
28 2002 1902 150.0 +6.06 -1.57 1.129 51.6% +23 — -18 61.0% +0.69 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) 104.0 -2.14 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) 104.5 -2.72
29 2003 1824 128.0 +5.26 -0.65 1.144 51.8% +15 — +122 56.0% +0.26 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) 95.2 -1.36 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) 95.8 +0.11
30 2004 1821 132.1 +3.67 -2.78 1.017 50.5% -4 — +106 55.7% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) 107.8 -0.15 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) 91.8 +0.77
31 2005 1787 139.4 +3.29 -2.83 0.958 49.7% -6 -261 +180 49.6% +0.03 14–3 (82%) 14–17 (45%) 104.6 -1.02 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) 95.7 -2.94
32 2006 1641 131.5 -1.70 -3.52 0.764 46.0% +59 -130 — 29.8% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 100.7 -1.33 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) 84.9 +0.06
Career — 2053 153.7 +5.40 -1.57 1.110 51.5% +18 -222 +32 57.4% +0.42 138–102 (58%) 252–196 (56%) 107.0 -2.75 — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.