H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Tim Henman H2H: 2-8

Tim Henman holds a 8–2 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 6–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2006 US Open first round 7-6(4) 6-2 6-3.

GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 8
10 main draw meetings
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 30, 2006* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Tim Henman #62 7-6(4) 6-2 6-3 Greg Rusedski #136 Match data
May 12, 2005* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tim Henman #9 7-6(3) 6-4 Greg Rusedski #45 Match data
Feb 24, 2005* Dubai ATP 250 R32 Hard Tim Henman #7 4-6 7-6(7) 6-4 Greg Rusedski #46 Match data
Jan 20, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Tim Henman #8 6-4 6-3 1-6 6-3 Greg Rusedski #25 Match data
Jan 5, 2002* Adelaide ATP 250 QF Hard Tim Henman #9 6-4 6-4 Greg Rusedski #31 Match data
Jan 4, 2001* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Tim Henman #10 6-2 7-6(4) Greg Rusedski #69 Match data
Mar 13, 1999* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tim Henman #7 6-4 2-6 6-4 Greg Rusedski #10 Match data
Nov 23, 1998 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Hard Greg Rusedski #11 6-2 6-4 Tim Henman #9 Match data
Oct 11, 1997* Vienna ATP 250 SF Carpet Greg Rusedski #4 6-4 6-4 Tim Henman #21 Match data
Oct 18, 1996* Ostrava ATP 250 R16 Carpet Tim Henman #26 7-6(2) 7-5 Greg Rusedski #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11