H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 2-3

Todd Woodbridge holds a 3–2 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–0 on carpet, while Todd Woodbridge leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Todd Woodbridge won the 1998 Australian Open third round 7-6(5) 6-4 6-2.

GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
AUS Age 55 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 25, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Todd Woodbridge #33 7-6(5) 6-4 6-2 Greg Rusedski #6 Match data
Sep 27, 1997* Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals R16 Carpet Greg Rusedski #10 4-6 6-1 7-5 Todd Woodbridge #28 Match data
Oct 3, 1996* Singapore ATP 250 R32 Carpet Greg Rusedski #84 6-4 6-1 Todd Woodbridge #34 Match data
Jun 13, 1996* Queen's Club ATP 250 R32 Grass Todd Woodbridge #38 6-1 6-4 Greg Rusedski #76 Match data
May 21, 1995* Coral Springs ATP 250 F Clay Todd Woodbridge #76 6-4 6-2 Greg Rusedski #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Todd Woodbridge #1,151 #19 1,575 1,857 237 229 50.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Todd Woodbridge
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 1–6 14.3% #213 1,453 0 0
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1989 6–6 50.0% #131 1,573 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1990 16–17 48.5% #50 1,704 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1991 23–25 47.9% #77 1,702 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1992 25–22 53.2% #54 1,684 0 0
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1993 19–20 48.7% #109 1,664 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1994 15–19 44.1% #90 1,661 0 0
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1995 32–22 59.3% #33 1,810 0 1
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1996 32–23 58.2% #36 1,744 0 1
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1997 31–20 60.8% #26 1,796 0 2
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 1998 21–21 50.0% #65 1,714 0 2
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 1999 8–16 33.3% #197 1,601 0 2
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2000 4–6 40.0% #187 1,588 0 2
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2001 4–6 40.0% #207 1,596 0 2
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15