H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Tommy Haas H2H: 4-1

Greg Rusedski holds a 4–1 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2002 Indianapolis semifinal 3-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 12, 2002 Indianapolis ATP 250 SF Hard Greg Rusedski #41 3-6 6-3 6-3 Tommy Haas #3 Match data
Apr 28, 2000* Barcelona ATP 250 R16 Clay Tommy Haas #20 7-6(6) 6-3 Greg Rusedski #16 Match data
Oct 30, 1999* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Greg Rusedski #6 6-4 6-3 Tommy Haas #13 Match data
Oct 3, 1999* Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals F Hard Greg Rusedski #6 6-3 6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(5) Tommy Haas #11 Match data
Nov 12, 1998* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Greg Rusedski #11 6-1 6-4 Tommy Haas #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 — — — — — — —
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15