H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 4-1

Greg Rusedski holds a 4–1 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–1 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2005 Newport final 7-6(3) 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Vincent Spadea
USA Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 10, 2005* Newport ATP 250 F Grass Greg Rusedski #39 7-6(3) 2-6 6-4 Vincent Spadea #49 Match data
Jun 18, 2004* Nottingham ATP 250 R16 Grass Greg Rusedski #110 7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 Vincent Spadea #30 Match data
Jun 28, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Vincent Spadea #61 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 6-7(8) 9-7 Greg Rusedski #22 Match data
Nov 13, 1998* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Hard Greg Rusedski #11 6-1 6-4 Vincent Spadea #44 Match data
Mar 12, 1998* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Greg Rusedski #6 4-6 6-3 6-4 Vincent Spadea #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Vincent Spadea #1,474 #18 1,629 1,876 310 348 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Greg Rusedski Vincent Spadea
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1993 1–5 16.7% #303 1,483 0 0
1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1994 11–13 45.8% #75 1,561 0 0
1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1995 21–28 42.9% #81 1,639 0 0
1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1996 27–22 55.1% #54 1,711 0 0
1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1997 20–26 43.5% #88 1,695 0 0
1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1998 28–27 50.9% #42 1,752 0 0
1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1999 33–27 55.0% #20 1,763 0 0
1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 2000 3–23 11.5% #213 1,545 0 0
2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 2001 1–3 25.0% #125 1,534 0 0
2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 2002 13–17 43.3% #67 1,623 0 0
2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 2003 34–25 57.6% #29 1,723 0 0
2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2004 39–25 60.9% #20 1,784 0 1
2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2005 21–24 46.7% #75 1,665 0 1
2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2006 19–26 42.2% #73 1,627 0 1
2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 2007 24–28 46.2% #77 1,650 0 1
— — — — — — — 2008 13–19 40.6% #76 1,657 0 1
— — — — — — — 2009 2–9 18.2% #295 1,526 0 1
— — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #1517 1,480 0 1