H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Grega Zemlja vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 1-0

Grega Zemlja holds a 1–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Grega Zemlja leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Grega Zemlja won the 2013 Queen's Club Championships second round 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Grega Zemlja
SLO Age 39 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Sergiy Stakhovsky
UKR Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Grega Zemlja #51 7-5 6-4 Sergiy Stakhovsky #116 Match data Jun 13, 2013* R32 Queen's Club Championships ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Grega Zemlja #1,144 #43 925 1,816 28 36 43.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sergiy Stakhovsky #678 #31 1,263 1,838 145 196 42.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Grega Zemlja Sergiy Stakhovsky
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #335 1,491 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 3–3 50.0% #184 1,527 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 1–2 33.3% #195 1,525 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2007 0–2 0.0% #199 1,509 0 0
22 2009 0–2 0.0% #174 1,500 0 0 2008 5–4 55.6% #92 1,615 0 1
23 2010 3–4 42.9% #142 1,616 0 0 2009 14–13 51.9% #60 1,751 0 2
24 2011 1–3 25.0% #116 1,588 0 0 2010 24–24 50.0% #46 1,743 0 4
25 2012 10–7 58.8% #55 1,775 0 0 2011 22–26 45.8% #62 1,707 0 4
26 2013 13–19 40.6% #121 1,719 0 0 2012 13–27 32.5% #103 1,737 0 4
27 — — — — — — — 2013 10–15 40.0% #98 1,678 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 2014 15–19 44.1% #58 1,685 0 4
29 2016 1–1 50.0% #155 1,609 0 0 2015 20–25 44.4% #62 1,715 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2016 6–13 31.6% #109 1,693 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2017 6–8 42.9% #122 1,728 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2018 2–5 28.6% #134 1,650 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2019 3–6 33.3% #150 1,576 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #202 1,568 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2021 1–2 33.3% #220 1,530 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Grega Zemlja Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2010 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 12 8 20 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 2012 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 12 14 26 46.2% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2013 4 11 15 26.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2012 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
29 2016 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 15 16 31 48.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 15 21 36 41.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — 90 116 206 43.7% 27 48 75 36.0% 24 28 52 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 64/64 of Grega Zemlja's and 340/341 of Sergiy Stakhovsky's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Grega Zemlja Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/1 3.0 0.0 75.0% 52.8% 33.3% 37.5% 0.0% 47.9% 26.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 6/6 7.8 2.3 68.1% 69.1% 51.4% 59.4% 48.7% 62.5% 30.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/3 8.7 3.0 63.9% 69.3% 44.4% 60.4% 28.3% 60.4% 28.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 3.5 2.5 56.3% 61.7% 48.8% 50.0% 25.0% 56.7% 30.6%
22 2009 2/2 3.5 4.5 58.5% 63.6% 45.5% 46.4% 16.7% 55.8% 28.6% 2008 9/9 4.9 2.1 64.2% 72.7% 48.9% 67.9% 38.9% 64.6% 31.6%
23 2010 7/7 9.4 2.1 60.8% 70.9% 58.6% 57.5% 41.3% 66.1% 31.9% 2009 27/27 6.5 2.3 63.7% 71.9% 48.8% 60.8% 43.0% 63.6% 35.5%
24 2011 4/4 6.0 3.0 64.4% 65.9% 53.3% 51.8% 22.8% 61.2% 33.1% 2010 48/48 6.8 2.5 63.4% 71.3% 46.5% 57.4% 34.7% 62.4% 35.6%
25 2012 17/17 7.8 2.5 59.3% 70.3% 49.0% 58.1% 43.2% 61.5% 36.4% 2011 48/48 5.5 1.9 62.0% 70.0% 50.3% 53.4% 40.4% 62.5% 36.8%
26 2013 32/32 7.3 3.6 57.1% 71.0% 44.9% 58.7% 35.4% 60.0% 35.0% 2012 39/40 6.4 3.1 59.5% 71.4% 52.8% 63.8% 36.1% 63.8% 34.7%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 25/25 6.4 2.7 63.1% 70.1% 51.1% 55.3% 37.2% 62.9% 35.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 34/34 6.3 3.4 64.2% 72.9% 47.6% 62.6% 43.5% 63.8% 34.9%
29 2016 2/2 2.5 1.5 50.0% 68.1% 49.8% 68.8% 34.8% 58.8% 43.6% 2015 45/45 6.5 2.4 61.9% 71.3% 51.1% 61.8% 35.4% 63.6% 35.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 19/19 6.8 4.1 56.6% 71.9% 48.9% 53.3% 39.4% 62.1% 32.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 14/14 9.4 2.5 62.2% 75.4% 51.6% 57.0% 39.5% 66.3% 32.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 7/7 8.9 3.3 61.6% 69.4% 46.8% 52.2% 21.1% 60.6% 32.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 9/9 9.1 2.7 63.5% 71.2% 49.6% 65.1% 39.6% 63.1% 30.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 4.0 3.0 67.1% 58.8% 48.0% 66.7% 100.0% 55.3% 32.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 3/3 9.0 4.3 57.2% 76.8% 51.5% 65.6% 56.1% 66.0% 29.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Grega Zemlja Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1492 96.9 +1.37 -0.87 0.503 37.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.01
19 2006 1482 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1528 104.8 -1.62 -2.88 0.808 46.3% +15 — — 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.25
20 2007 1469 98.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1525 115.1 +0.53 -0.16 0.727 45.0% -1 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — -0.41
21 2008 1476 100.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1509 105.4 -2.12 -0.77 0.706 43.5% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.11
22 2009 1501 100.5 -1.00 -2.32 0.647 42.1% — — — 0.0% -2.80 — — — -0.10 2008 1615 119.8 -0.38 -0.29 0.891 48.7% +20 — — 52.6% -0.16 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -0.41
23 2010 1616 121.4 +1.79 -0.54 0.940 49.9% -5 — — 40.0% -0.35 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.13 2009 1751 134.9 -0.48 -0.33 0.976 50.0% +28 -170 -104 51.5% -0.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) — +1.40
24 2011 1589 113.3 -0.21 -2.04 0.852 47.2% — — — 40.0% -1.07 0–1 1–1 — -0.10 2010 1743 144.9 -0.90 -0.51 0.949 49.4% +38 -194 -15 52.2% -0.02 10–9 (53%) 14–7 (67%) — -0.67
25 2012 1776 133.5 -0.62 +0.21 0.945 49.0% +24 — -150 53.2% -0.06 4–1 (80%) 7–2 (78%) — +0.56 2011 1708 143.8 -0.30 -0.35 0.981 49.5% +47 -57 -27 45.3% -0.39 6–5 (55%) 12–8 (60%) — +0.79
26 2013 1720 137.2 -1.50 -1.44 0.877 47.7% -39 -96 -13 44.0% -0.57 5–5 (50%) 10–7 (59%) — -1.83 2012 1737 144.8 +0.53 -1.27 0.957 49.3% +40 -119 -83 41.1% -0.43 3–9 (25%) 13–15 (46%) — -1.40
27 2014 1683 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1678 130.6 -0.70 -1.39 0.958 49.3% +35 -75 +62 46.3% -0.34 1–7 (13%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.19
28 2015 1668 104.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1686 132.7 -0.47 -0.60 0.964 49.2% -20 -108 +86 44.8% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.26
29 2016 1610 108.2 -1.22 -0.54 1.058 51.3% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — +0.33 2015 1716 153.5 -0.56 +0.26 0.966 49.5% +47 -150 -2 46.2% -0.07 8–7 (53%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.06
30 2017 1570 97.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1694 134.5 -0.30 -1.40 0.864 47.7% -19 — +108 37.2% -0.77 3–2 (60%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.26
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1728 130.1 +1.63 -2.29 0.977 50.1% -72 -66 — 47.2% -0.17 0–3 (0%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.83
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1650 117.1 -1.87 -0.92 0.835 46.9% — — +170 36.4% -0.86 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1577 114.4 -0.93 -3.10 0.837 47.7% +2 — +208 34.8% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.66
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1569 108.7 -0.29 -0.75 0.732 45.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.10
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1531 99.7 -1.61 -0.72 0.856 48.7% +30 — — 40.0% -0.20 1–1 0–2 — +0.06
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1516 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1817 124.8 -0.80 -0.94 0.897 48.2% -8 -96 -54 44.6% -0.49 10–8 (56%) 19–12 (61%) 108.4 -1.98 — 1839 138.5 -0.39 -0.77 0.940 49.1% +25 -108 +39 45.2% -0.32 54–56 (49%) 80–71 (53%) 105.1 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.