H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Grega Zemlja vs Teymuraz Gabashvili H2H: 0-1
Teymuraz Gabashvili holds a 1–0 lead over Grega Zemlja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Teymuraz Gabashvili leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Teymuraz Gabashvili won the 2010 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 39
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q2 | Grass | Teymuraz Gabashvili | 7-5 6-3 | Grega Zemlja | Match data |
| May 27, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Teymuraz Gabashvili | 6-3 6-1 6-1 | Grega Zemlja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grega Zemlja | #1,144 | #43 | 925 | 1,816 | 27 | 35 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Teymuraz Gabashvili | #1,373 | #43 | 1,226 | 1,836 | 109 | 194 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Grega Zemlja | Teymuraz Gabashvili | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–28 | 26.3% | #125 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #142 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #116 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #80 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #121 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #138 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #182 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #50 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #138 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |