H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Gregory Carraz vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 2-1
Gregory Carraz holds a 2–1 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Gregory Carraz leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Gregory Carraz won the 2005 Queen's Club second round 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2005* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Gregory Carraz | 3-0 (ret.) | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2004 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Gregory Carraz | 6-3 6-3 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2004* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sargis Sargsian | 3-6 6-0 6-3 | Gregory Carraz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory Carraz | #1,461 | #54 | 663 | 1,714 | 35 | 53 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gregory Carraz | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #312 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2003 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #67 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2004 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #90 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2005 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #167 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |