H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Grigor Dimitrov vs Albert Ramos-Vinolas H2H: 2-1

Grigor Dimitrov holds a 2–1 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Grigor Dimitrov leads 2–0 on clay, while Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2016 Chengdu Open semifinal 7-6(6) 1-6 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Grigor Dimitrov
Bulgaria Age 35 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #31 7-6(6) 1-6 7-6(3) Grigor Dimitrov #21 Match data Oct 1, 2016* SF Chengdu Open ATP 250 Hard
Grigor Dimitrov #14 4-6 6-3 6-4 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #101 Match data Apr 16, 2014* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Grigor Dimitrov #69 7-6(1) 6-3 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #46 Match data Jul 14, 2012* QF Swedish Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Grigor Dimitrov #137 #3 5,150 2,170 477 314 60.3% 0 1 1 1 6 9
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Grigor Dimitrov Albert Ramos-Vinolas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2008 0–1 0.0% #493 1,478 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2009 2–6 25.0% #288 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2010 1–1 50.0% #106 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2011 18–25 41.9% #76 1,740 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2012 24–19 55.8% #48 1,845 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2013 35–23 60.3% #23 1,955 0 1 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0
23 2014 50–18 73.5% #11 2,092 0 4 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0
24 2015 32–22 59.3% #28 1,951 0 4 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0
25 2016 40–26 60.6% #17 2,002 0 4 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0
26 2017 49–19 72.1% #3 2,134 0 8 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0
27 2018 24–19 55.8% #19 1,934 0 8 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0
28 2019 23–21 52.3% #20 1,928 0 8 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1
29 2020 17–10 63.0% #19 1,936 0 8 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1
30 2021 24–18 57.1% #28 1,932 0 8 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1
31 2022 26–22 54.2% #28 1,863 0 8 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2
32 2023 41–21 66.1% #14 2,094 0 8 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2
33 2024 45–18 71.4% #10 2,011 0 9 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3
34 2025 18–12 60.0% #44 1,958 0 9 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4
35 2026 8–13 38.1% #137 1,770 0 9 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Grigor Dimitrov Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2008 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 11 16 27 40.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 10 11 21 47.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 22 15 37 59.5% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 2014 28 13 41 68.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — —
24 2015 20 15 35 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2016 34 18 52 65.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2017 39 11 50 78.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — —
27 2018 16 12 28 57.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2019 18 13 31 58.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2020 11 8 19 57.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2017 9 15 24 37.5% 22 13 35 62.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 2021 20 12 32 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2018 5 13 18 27.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2022 15 15 30 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2023 26 13 39 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — —
33 2024 33 12 45 73.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
34 2025 10 7 17 58.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
35 2026 2 8 10 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2023 1 7 8 12.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 316 202 518 61.0% 106 76 182 58.2% 55 36 91 60.4% — 72 135 207 34.8% 198 174 372 53.2% 6 19 25 24.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 781/791 of Grigor Dimitrov's and 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Grigor Dimitrov Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2008 1/1 1.0 3.0 70.8% 58.8% 35.7% 33.3% 0.0% 52.1% 20.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 8/8 4.8 3.1 58.8% 69.4% 43.1% 46.4% 36.1% 58.5% 30.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 2/2 8.5 3.0 55.4% 75.2% 40.1% 53.6% 28.6% 59.3% 27.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 43/43 5.4 3.7 59.6% 70.9% 50.5% 55.6% 36.8% 62.6% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 41/43 7.3 2.8 62.6% 72.6% 53.3% 65.4% 38.7% 65.5% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 58/58 8.1 2.8 61.7% 77.0% 51.5% 58.3% 43.5% 67.2% 36.8% 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1%
23 2014 67/68 7.8 3.2 60.7% 77.6% 54.1% 59.6% 45.6% 68.4% 37.7% 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0%
24 2015 54/54 7.3 2.8 62.3% 75.8% 53.0% 63.2% 39.4% 67.3% 37.4% 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7%
25 2016 64/66 5.8 3.4 64.3% 73.3% 52.7% 59.2% 43.2% 65.9% 37.6% 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6%
26 2017 68/68 8.2 3.7 62.6% 79.1% 53.6% 66.2% 40.1% 69.3% 39.0% 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3%
27 2018 43/43 7.7 5.2 61.4% 73.6% 48.8% 59.5% 37.5% 64.2% 35.0% 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8%
28 2019 43/44 7.3 4.2 62.3% 74.9% 50.0% 59.9% 46.6% 65.5% 37.4% 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7%
29 2020 26/27 4.7 4.3 61.7% 72.4% 51.6% 66.4% 46.4% 64.0% 41.2% 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9%
30 2021 42/42 5.0 3.5 63.6% 74.4% 51.3% 61.6% 43.2% 65.9% 39.4% 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7%
31 2022 48/48 5.6 2.9 63.1% 76.0% 51.7% 55.2% 41.7% 67.0% 36.9% 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8%
32 2023 60/62 7.3 3.4 61.1% 77.0% 50.7% 62.2% 43.9% 66.9% 38.6% 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9%
33 2024 63/63 8.4 3.7 61.3% 80.7% 53.7% 61.1% 40.2% 70.2% 37.7% 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0%
34 2025 29/30 7.5 3.4 59.4% 74.4% 50.7% 55.8% 36.9% 64.9% 36.4% 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8%
35 2026 21/21 8.7 4.6 61.3% 74.5% 47.9% 45.2% 36.7% 64.1% 33.8% 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5%
Career — 781/791 7.1 3.5 61.9% 75.7% 51.8% 60.1% 41.4% 66.5% 37.3% — 602/604 3.3 2.4 62.4% 67.6% 51.6% 58.5% 42.4% 61.5% 37.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Grigor Dimitrov Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2008 1479 90.8 -1.82 +0.78 0.437 37.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1490 121.9 -1.06 -2.37 0.732 45.0% +40 — +34 33.3% -0.89 2–2 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1493 103.4 -2.32 -0.55 0.667 44.5% — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.02 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1740 144.9 -0.28 -0.43 0.959 49.3% +7 -209 -140 42.0% -0.20 6–5 (55%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.35 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 1845 146.9 +2.63 -0.68 1.039 50.7% -52 -102 -118 54.2% +0.23 8–4 (67%) 12–13 (48%) — -1.45 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 1955 168.1 +4.20 +0.76 1.120 51.9% -13 -58 -221 55.8% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 9–13 (41%) — -1.02 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
23 2014 2093 169.3 +4.59 +2.51 1.192 52.9% -39 -97 -71 64.0% +0.90 18–4 (82%) 20–14 (59%) — -0.89 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.23
24 2015 1951 164.5 +2.92 +1.96 1.144 52.0% +20 +74 +48 56.7% +0.38 11–10 (52%) 15–10 (60%) — +0.70 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) — -0.55
25 2016 2002 165.1 +2.53 +2.13 1.103 51.5% +34 -107 -45 57.3% +0.34 13–12 (52%) 22–12 (65%) — +0.60 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.49
26 2017 2135 173.4 +5.21 +3.48 1.271 53.8% +37 -256 -168 67.2% +1.06 14–12 (54%) 17–10 (63%) — -0.86 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) — -1.20
27 2018 1935 162.0 +0.98 +0.10 0.977 49.9% +68 -30 +8 52.1% +0.11 11–8 (58%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.60 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.24
28 2019 1929 159.5 +1.70 +2.11 1.083 51.2% +44 -27 — 51.7% +0.43 6–7 (46%) 9–21 (30%) — -0.32 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.25
29 2020 1937 153.3 +1.01 +3.79 1.145 52.8% -6 -28 — 60.6% +0.73 4–7 (36%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.24 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) — +3.34
30 2021 1933 159.4 +2.32 +3.30 1.156 52.4% +43 -91 — 55.8% +0.52 7–3 (70%) 6–10 (38%) — -0.28 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.45
31 2022 1864 154.9 +2.60 +1.06 1.118 51.5% +7 +84 -57 53.6% +0.38 8–5 (62%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.43 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.29
32 2023 2095 166.4 +3.66 +3.67 1.165 52.5% -15 -108 -209 63.6% +0.87 12–4 (75%) 18–16 (53%) — -3.30 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) — +0.07
33 2024 2011 162.4 +5.31 +2.38 1.263 53.3% +29 -22 -64 68.7% +1.06 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) — +1.17 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.43
34 2025 1959 144.8 +0.59 +1.48 1.035 50.6% +68 -56 0 65.6% +0.61 5–1 (83%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.39 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.15
35 2026 1771 127.1 -0.23 -0.93 0.942 49.0% +61 +41 +178 43.3% -0.28 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.37 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) — +1.27
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39
Career — 2171 167.1 +2.86 +1.80 1.114 51.7% +17 -58 -71 57.8% +0.52 152–104 (59%) 204–178 (53%) 104.1 -0.55 — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.