H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Grigor Dimitrov vs Andy Roddick H2H: 0-1
Andy Roddick holds a 1–0 lead over Grigor Dimitrov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andy Roddick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andy Roddick won the 2011 Shanghai Masters third round 7-6(3) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Bulgaria
Age 35
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2011* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Andy Roddick | 7-6(3) 7-5 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grigor Dimitrov | #146 | #3 | 5,150 | 2,176 | 476 | 310 | 60.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| Andy Roddick | #40 | #1 | 5,800 | 2,177 | 577 | 196 | 74.6% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 32 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Grigor Dimitrov | Andy Roddick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #156 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2011 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #76 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 71–18 | 79.8% | #1 | 2,092 | 1 | 11 |
| 21 | 2012 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #48 | 1,846 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #2 | 2,078 | 1 | 15 |
| 22 | 2013 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #23 | 1,954 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,031 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 2014 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #11 | 2,095 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #6 | 1,998 | 1 | 21 |
| 24 | 2015 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #28 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,009 | 1 | 23 |
| 25 | 2016 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #17 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,008 | 1 | 26 |
| 26 | 2017 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #3 | 2,134 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #7 | 2,046 | 1 | 27 |
| 27 | 2018 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,933 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 1 | 29 |
| 28 | 2019 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #20 | 1,944 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,024 | 1 | 30 |
| 29 | 2020 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,957 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #39 | 1,987 | 1 | 32 |
| 30 | 2021 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #14 | 2,095 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #10 | 2,008 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #44 | 1,956 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2026 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #146 | 1,810 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |