H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Grigor Dimitrov vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 4-2

Grigor Dimitrov holds a 4–2 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Feliciano Lopez leads 2–1 on grass, while Grigor Dimitrov leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grigor Dimitrov won the 2019 Miami Masters second round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Grigor Dimitrov
Bulgaria Age 35 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 23, 2019* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Grigor Dimitrov #29 6-1 6-3 Feliciano Lopez #94 Match data
Aug 16, 2017* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Grigor Dimitrov #11 7-6(5) 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #34 Match data
Jun 24, 2017* Queen's Club ATP 250 SF Grass Feliciano Lopez #32 7-5 3-6 6-2 Grigor Dimitrov #11 Match data
Aug 17, 2016* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Grigor Dimitrov #34 5-7 6-3 7-6(6) Feliciano Lopez #18 Match data
Jun 15, 2014* Queen's Club ATP 500 F Grass Grigor Dimitrov #13 6-7(8) 7-6(1) 7-6(6) Feliciano Lopez #29 Match data
Jun 10, 2010* Queen's Club ATP 500 R32 Grass Feliciano Lopez #31 6-2 6-4 Grigor Dimitrov #360 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Grigor Dimitrov #146 #3 5,150 2,176 476 310 60.6% 0 1 1 2 5 9
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Grigor Dimitrov Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
17 2008 0–1 0.0% #493 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2009 2–6 25.0% #288 1,490 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 2010 1–1 50.0% #106 1,494 0 0 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 2011 18–25 41.9% #76 1,739 0 0 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0
21 2012 23–18 56.1% #48 1,846 0 0 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0
22 2013 35–23 60.3% #23 1,954 0 1 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1
23 2014 50–18 73.5% #11 2,095 0 4 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 2015 32–22 59.3% #28 1,950 0 4 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1
25 2016 40–25 61.5% #17 2,018 0 4 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1
26 2017 49–19 72.1% #3 2,134 0 8 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1
27 2018 24–19 55.8% #19 1,933 0 8 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1
28 2019 23–21 52.3% #20 1,944 0 8 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2
29 2020 17–10 63.0% #19 1,957 0 8 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 2021 24–18 57.1% #28 1,935 0 8 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2
31 2022 26–22 54.2% #28 1,864 0 8 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 2023 41–21 66.1% #14 2,095 0 8 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4
33 2024 45–18 71.4% #10 2,008 0 9 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4
34 2025 18–12 60.0% #44 1,956 0 9 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5
35 2026 8–11 42.1% #146 1,810 0 9 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 — — — — — — — 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7