H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Grigor Dimitrov vs Ivan Dodig H2H: 3-0
Grigor Dimitrov holds a 3–0 lead over Ivan Dodig in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Grigor Dimitrov leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Grigor Dimitrov won the 2015 Istanbul quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Bulgaria
Age 35
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2015* | Istanbul | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Grigor Dimitrov | 6-4 6-3 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2012* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Grigor Dimitrov | 6-1 6-4 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2011* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Grigor Dimitrov | 6-2 7-5 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grigor Dimitrov | #146 | #3 | 5,150 | 2,176 | 476 | 310 | 60.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Grigor Dimitrov | Ivan Dodig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #76 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #48 | 1,846 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #23 | 1,954 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2014 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #11 | 2,095 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #28 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #17 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #3 | 2,134 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,933 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #20 | 1,944 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,957 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2022 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2023 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #14 | 2,095 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2024 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #10 | 2,008 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #44 | 1,956 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2026 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #146 | 1,810 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |