H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Grigor Dimitrov vs Ivo Karlovic H2H: 4-2

Grigor Dimitrov holds a 4–2 lead over Ivo Karlovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Grigor Dimitrov leads 3–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Grigor Dimitrov won the 2017 Madrid Masters third round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Grigor Dimitrov
Bulgaria Age 35 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 10, 2017* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Grigor Dimitrov #12 6-3 7-5 Ivo Karlovic #22 Match data
Jul 29, 2016* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Grigor Dimitrov #40 6-3 7-5 Ivo Karlovic #27 Match data
Apr 30, 2016* Istanbul ATP 250 SF Clay Grigor Dimitrov #29 7-6(0) 7-6(2) Ivo Karlovic #31 Match data
May 28, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Ivo Karlovic #37 6-4 7-5 7-6(4) Grigor Dimitrov #12 Match data
May 14, 2014* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Grigor Dimitrov #14 7-6(3) 6-4 Ivo Karlovic #52 Match data
Feb 7, 2013* Zagreb ATP 250 R32 Hard Ivo Karlovic #130 7-6(3) 7-6(3) Grigor Dimitrov #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Grigor Dimitrov #146 #3 5,150 2,176 476 310 60.6% 0 1 1 2 5 9
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Grigor Dimitrov Ivo Karlovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2008 0–1 0.0% #493 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2009 2–6 25.0% #288 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2010 1–1 50.0% #106 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2011 18–25 41.9% #76 1,739 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2012 23–18 56.1% #48 1,846 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2013 35–23 60.3% #23 1,954 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0
23 2014 50–18 73.5% #11 2,095 0 4 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0
24 2015 32–22 59.3% #28 1,950 0 4 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0
25 2016 40–25 61.5% #17 2,018 0 4 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0
26 2017 49–19 72.1% #3 2,134 0 8 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0
27 2018 24–19 55.8% #19 1,933 0 8 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0
28 2019 23–21 52.3% #20 1,944 0 8 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3
29 2020 17–10 63.0% #19 1,957 0 8 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4
30 2021 24–18 57.1% #28 1,935 0 8 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4
31 2022 26–22 54.2% #28 1,864 0 8 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4
32 2023 41–21 66.1% #14 2,095 0 8 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4
33 2024 45–18 71.4% #10 2,008 0 9 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4
34 2025 18–12 60.0% #44 1,956 0 9 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5
35 2026 8–11 42.1% #146 1,810 0 9 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8
38 — — — — — — — 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8