H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Grigor Dimitrov vs John Isner H2H: 2-2
Grigor Dimitrov and John Isner are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Grigor Dimitrov won the 2022 Indian Wells Masters fourth round 6-3 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Bulgaria
Age 35
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
208 cm / 6'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2022* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Grigor Dimitrov | 6-3 7-6(6) | John Isner | Match data |
| Nov 3, 2017* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | John Isner | 7-6(10) 5-7 7-6(3) | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| Aug 19, 2017* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Grigor Dimitrov | 7-6(4) 7-6(10) | John Isner | Match data |
| Mar 30, 2015* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | John Isner | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grigor Dimitrov | #146 | #3 | 5,150 | 2,176 | 476 | 310 | 60.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| John Isner | #660 | #8 | 3,720 | 2,053 | 467 | 293 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 16 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Grigor Dimitrov | John Isner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #76 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #48 | 1,846 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #23 | 1,954 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #106 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #11 | 2,095 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #28 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #34 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #17 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2017 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #3 | 2,134 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #18 | 2,021 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2018 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,933 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2019 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #20 | 1,944 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,983 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2020 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,957 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 2021 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 2,026 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 2022 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #19 | 2,019 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 2023 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #14 | 2,095 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #17 | 1,984 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 2024 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #10 | 2,008 | 0 | 9 | 2018 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 |
| 34 | 2025 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #44 | 1,956 | 0 | 9 | 2019 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 15 |
| 35 | 2026 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #146 | 1,810 | 0 | 9 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,933 | 0 | 16 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #41 | 1,891 | 0 | 16 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #172 | 1,698 | 0 | 16 |