H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Grigor Dimitrov vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 1-0
Grigor Dimitrov holds a 1–0 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Grigor Dimitrov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Grigor Dimitrov won the 2012 Gstaad quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Bulgaria
Age 35
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2012* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Grigor Dimitrov | 6-3 6-2 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grigor Dimitrov | #146 | #3 | 5,150 | 2,176 | 476 | 310 | 60.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Grigor Dimitrov | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #76 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #48 | 1,846 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #23 | 1,954 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #11 | 2,095 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #28 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #17 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #3 | 2,134 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,933 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #20 | 1,944 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,957 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #14 | 2,095 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #10 | 2,008 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #44 | 1,956 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #146 | 1,810 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |