H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Grigor Dimitrov vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 8-1

Grigor Dimitrov holds a 8–1 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Grigor Dimitrov leads 5–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Grigor Dimitrov won the 2017 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-2 6-1.

Bulgaria Age 35 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
8 1
9 main draw meetings
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 6, 2017* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Grigor Dimitrov #11 6-3 6-2 6-1 Marcos Baghdatis #65 Match data
Nov 3, 2016* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Grigor Dimitrov #18 6-3 0-0 (ret.) Marcos Baghdatis #37 Match data
Jan 25, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Grigor Dimitrov #11 4-6 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-3 Marcos Baghdatis #78 Match data
Feb 27, 2014* Acapulco ATP 500 R16 Hard Grigor Dimitrov #22 6-1 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #149 Match data
May 14, 2013* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Grigor Dimitrov #26 6-3 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #38 Match data
Feb 16, 2013* Rotterdam ATP 500 QF Hard Grigor Dimitrov #41 6-7(4) 7-6(0) 6-3 Marcos Baghdatis #36 Match data
Jan 5, 2013* Brisbane ATP 250 SF Hard Grigor Dimitrov #48 6-3 5-7 7-6(5) Marcos Baghdatis #36 Match data
Jun 28, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Marcos Baghdatis #42 7-5 4-1 (ret.) Grigor Dimitrov #69 Match data
Apr 29, 2011* Munich ATP 250 R16 Clay Grigor Dimitrov #69 3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Grigor Dimitrov #146 #3 5,150 2,176 476 310 60.6% 0 1 1 2 5 9
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Grigor Dimitrov Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2008 0–1 0.0% #493 1,479 0 0
18 2009 2–6 25.0% #288 1,490 0 0
19 2010 1–1 50.0% #106 1,494 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2011 18–25 41.9% #76 1,739 0 0 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2012 23–18 56.1% #48 1,846 0 0 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2013 35–23 60.3% #23 1,954 0 1 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2014 50–18 73.5% #11 2,095 0 4 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2015 32–22 59.3% #28 1,950 0 4 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2016 40–25 61.5% #17 2,018 0 4 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2017 49–19 72.1% #3 2,134 0 8 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2018 24–19 55.8% #19 1,933 0 8 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2019 23–21 52.3% #20 1,944 0 8 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2020 17–10 63.0% #19 1,957 0 8 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2021 24–18 57.1% #28 1,935 0 8 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2022 26–22 54.2% #28 1,864 0 8 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2023 41–21 66.1% #14 2,095 0 8 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2024 45–18 71.4% #10 2,008 0 9 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2025 18–12 60.0% #44 1,956 0 9 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4
35 2026 8–11 42.1% #146 1,810 0 9