H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Grigor Dimitrov vs Marin Cilic H2H: 3-3

Grigor Dimitrov and Marin Cilic are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Grigor Dimitrov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Grigor Dimitrov won the 2021 Australian Open first round 6-4 6-2 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Grigor Dimitrov
Bulgaria Age 35 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Marin Cilic
Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 10, 2021* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Grigor Dimitrov #21 6-4 6-2 7-6(5) Marin Cilic #43 Match data
May 30, 2019* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Grigor Dimitrov #46 6-7(3) 6-4 4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 Marin Cilic #13 Match data
Nov 2, 2018* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Marin Cilic #7 7-6(5) 6-4 Grigor Dimitrov #10 Match data
Aug 20, 2016* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Marin Cilic #14 4-6 6-3 7-5 Grigor Dimitrov #34 Match data
Nov 5, 2015* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Grigor Dimitrov #29 7-6(3) 7-6(2) Marin Cilic #11 Match data
Jan 3, 2014* Brisbane ATP 250 R16 Hard Marin Cilic #37 7-5 7-5 Grigor Dimitrov #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Grigor Dimitrov #146 #3 5,150 2,176 476 310 60.6% 0 1 1 2 5 9
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Grigor Dimitrov Marin Cilic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0
17 2008 0–1 0.0% #493 1,479 0 0 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0
18 2009 2–6 25.0% #288 1,490 0 0 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0
19 2010 1–1 50.0% #106 1,494 0 0 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1
20 2011 18–25 41.9% #76 1,739 0 0 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3
21 2012 23–18 56.1% #48 1,846 0 0 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5
22 2013 35–23 60.3% #23 1,954 0 1 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6
23 2014 50–18 73.5% #11 2,095 0 4 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8
24 2015 32–22 59.3% #28 1,950 0 4 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9
25 2016 40–25 61.5% #17 2,018 0 4 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13
26 2017 49–19 72.1% #3 2,134 0 8 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14
27 2018 24–19 55.8% #19 1,933 0 8 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16
28 2019 23–21 52.3% #20 1,944 0 8 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17
29 2020 17–10 63.0% #19 1,957 0 8 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18
30 2021 24–18 57.1% #28 1,935 0 8 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18
31 2022 26–22 54.2% #28 1,864 0 8 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18
32 2023 41–21 66.1% #14 2,095 0 8 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20
33 2024 45–18 71.4% #10 2,008 0 9 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20
34 2025 18–12 60.0% #44 1,956 0 9 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20
35 2026 8–11 42.1% #146 1,810 0 9 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21
36 — — — — — — — 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21
37 — — — — — — — 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21