H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Grigor Dimitrov vs Stan Wawrinka H2H: 6-7
Stan Wawrinka holds a 7–6 lead over Grigor Dimitrov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, Stan Wawrinka leads 4–2 on hard courts, while Grigor Dimitrov leads 3–2 on clay. Most recently, Grigor Dimitrov won the 2023 Rome Masters second round 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Bulgaria
Age 35
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
6
–
7
13 main draw meetings
Switzerland
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2023* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Grigor Dimitrov | 6-4 7-6(3) | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2020* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Grigor Dimitrov | 6-4 6-4 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2019* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Stan Wawrinka | 5-7 6-4 7-6(4) | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| Aug 7, 2019* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Stan Wawrinka | 6-4 6-4 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| Jun 1, 2019* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Stan Wawrinka | 7-6(5) 7-6(4) 7-6(8) | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2018* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Stan Wawrinka | 6-3 6-2 7-5 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| Jul 4, 2018* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Stan Wawrinka | 1-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5) 6-4 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| Aug 19, 2016* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Grigor Dimitrov | 6-4 6-4 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| May 8, 2015* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Grigor Dimitrov | 7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Apr 17, 2015* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Grigor Dimitrov | 6-1 6-2 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2014* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | SF | Grass | Grigor Dimitrov | 6-2 6-4 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| May 10, 2013* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Stan Wawrinka | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Stan Wawrinka | 7-5 6-3 6-3 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grigor Dimitrov | #146 | #3 | 5,150 | 2,176 | 476 | 310 | 60.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| Stan Wawrinka | #117 | #3 | 6,865 | 2,268 | 564 | 371 | 60.3% | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 16 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Grigor Dimitrov | Stan Wawrinka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #76 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #48 | 1,846 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #30 | 1,867 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2013 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #23 | 1,954 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2014 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #11 | 2,095 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #13 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2015 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #28 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2016 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #17 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2017 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #3 | 2,134 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,915 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2018 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,933 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 2,018 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2019 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #20 | 1,944 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #8 | 2,113 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2020 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,957 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #4 | 2,071 | 1 | 7 |
| 30 | 2021 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #4 | 2,199 | 2 | 11 |
| 31 | 2022 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #4 | 2,129 | 3 | 15 |
| 32 | 2023 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #14 | 2,095 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 26–11 | 70.3% | #9 | 2,120 | 3 | 16 |
| 33 | 2024 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #10 | 2,008 | 0 | 9 | 2018 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,946 | 3 | 16 |
| 34 | 2025 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #44 | 1,956 | 0 | 9 | 2019 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #16 | 2,021 | 3 | 16 |
| 35 | 2026 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #146 | 1,810 | 0 | 9 | 2020 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #18 | 2,001 | 3 | 16 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,916 | 3 | 16 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #148 | 1,824 | 3 | 16 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,782 | 3 | 16 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #161 | 1,714 | 3 | 16 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #157 | 1,640 | 3 | 16 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,632 | 3 | 16 |