H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Grigor Dimitrov vs Tommy Robredo H2H: 2-3

Tommy Robredo holds a 3–2 lead over Grigor Dimitrov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Grigor Dimitrov won the 2017 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Grigor Dimitrov
Bulgaria Age 35 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 1, 2017* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Grigor Dimitrov #47 6-3 6-4 7-5 Tommy Robredo #274 Match data
Apr 14, 2017* Marrakech ATP 250 R16 Clay Tommy Robredo #385 6-4 1-6 6-1 Grigor Dimitrov #12 Match data
Mar 17, 2015* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tommy Robredo #19 6-4 1-6 7-5 Grigor Dimitrov #11 Match data
Aug 8, 2014* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Grigor Dimitrov #8 7-5 5-7 6-4 Tommy Robredo #20 Match data
Apr 25, 2013* Barcelona ATP 500 R32 Clay Tommy Robredo #43 7-5 6-1 Grigor Dimitrov #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Grigor Dimitrov #146 #3 5,150 2,176 476 310 60.6% 0 1 1 2 5 9
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Grigor Dimitrov Tommy Robredo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2008 0–1 0.0% #493 1,479 0 0 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0
18 2009 2–6 25.0% #288 1,490 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0
19 2010 1–1 50.0% #106 1,494 0 0 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1
20 2011 18–25 41.9% #76 1,739 0 0 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1
21 2012 23–18 56.1% #48 1,846 0 0 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1
22 2013 35–23 60.3% #23 1,954 0 1 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2
23 2014 50–18 73.5% #11 2,095 0 4 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2
24 2015 32–22 59.3% #28 1,950 0 4 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4
25 2016 40–25 61.5% #17 2,018 0 4 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6
26 2017 49–19 72.1% #3 2,134 0 8 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7
27 2018 24–19 55.8% #19 1,933 0 8 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9
28 2019 23–21 52.3% #20 1,944 0 8 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9
29 2020 17–10 63.0% #19 1,957 0 8 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10
30 2021 24–18 57.1% #28 1,935 0 8 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10
31 2022 26–22 54.2% #28 1,864 0 8 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12
32 2023 41–21 66.1% #14 2,095 0 8 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12
33 2024 45–18 71.4% #10 2,008 0 9 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12
34 2025 18–12 60.0% #44 1,956 0 9 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12
35 2026 8–11 42.1% #146 1,810 0 9 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12
36 — — — — — — — 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12
37 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12