H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Grigor Dimitrov vs Vasek Pospisil H2H: 3-1

Grigor Dimitrov holds a 3–1 lead over Vasek Pospisil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Grigor Dimitrov leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Vasek Pospisil won the 2016 Shanghai Masters third round 7-5 7-6(2).

Bulgaria Age 35 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
CAN Age 36 Right-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 12, 2016* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Vasek Pospisil #131 7-5 7-6(2) Grigor Dimitrov #18 Match data
Aug 19, 2015* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Grigor Dimitrov #17 7-6(4) 7-6(5) Vasek Pospisil #47 Match data
Mar 28, 2015* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Grigor Dimitrov #11 6-2 6-2 Vasek Pospisil #60 Match data
Oct 24, 2014* Basel ATP 500 R16 Hard Grigor Dimitrov #11 6-2 6-2 Vasek Pospisil #44 Match data
Oct 1, 2012 Tokyo ATP 500 Q2 Q Hard Grigor Dimitrov #60 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 Vasek Pospisil #115 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Grigor Dimitrov #146 #3 5,150 2,176 476 310 60.6% 0 1 1 2 5 9
Vasek Pospisil #1,265 #25 1,359 1,958 122 161 43.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Grigor Dimitrov Vasek Pospisil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2008 0–1 0.0% #493 1,479 0 0
18 2009 2–6 25.0% #288 1,490 0 0
19 2010 1–1 50.0% #106 1,494 0 0
20 2011 18–25 41.9% #76 1,739 0 0
21 2012 23–18 56.1% #48 1,846 0 0 2011 3–4 42.9% #119 1,668 0 0
22 2013 35–23 60.3% #23 1,954 0 1 2012 4–12 25.0% #125 1,607 0 0
23 2014 50–18 73.5% #11 2,095 0 4 2013 17–15 53.1% #32 1,798 0 0
24 2015 32–22 59.3% #28 1,950 0 4 2014 20–24 45.5% #53 1,808 0 0
25 2016 40–25 61.5% #17 2,018 0 4 2015 24–22 52.2% #39 1,869 0 0
26 2017 49–19 72.1% #3 2,134 0 8 2016 9–21 30.0% #133 1,749 0 0
27 2018 24–19 55.8% #19 1,933 0 8 2017 6–13 31.6% #108 1,697 0 0
28 2019 23–21 52.3% #20 1,944 0 8 2018 8–14 36.4% #70 1,757 0 0
29 2020 17–10 63.0% #19 1,957 0 8 2019 3–5 37.5% #149 1,810 0 0
30 2021 24–18 57.1% #28 1,935 0 8 2020 16–10 61.5% #61 1,926 0 0
31 2022 26–22 54.2% #28 1,864 0 8 2021 8–14 36.4% #133 1,761 0 0
32 2023 41–21 66.1% #14 2,095 0 8 2022 4–3 57.1% #98 1,715 0 0
33 2024 45–18 71.4% #10 2,008 0 9 2023 0–2 0.0% #437 1,648 0 0
34 2025 18–12 60.0% #44 1,956 0 9 2024 0–1 0.0% #733 1,626 0 0
35 2026 8–11 42.1% #146 1,810 0 9 2025 0–1 0.0% #1265 1,610 0 0