H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Guillaume Raoux vs C. Steeb H2H: 0-1
C. Steeb holds a 1–0 lead over Guillaume Raoux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, C. Steeb leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, C. Steeb won the 1990 Miami Masters second round 2-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1990* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | C. Steeb | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Guillaume Raoux | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,806 | 175 | 222 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| C. Steeb | #1,355 | #14 | 1,095 | 1,920 | 189 | 190 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillaume Raoux | C. Steeb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #73 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #94 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #89 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #67 | 1,660 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #179 | 1,540 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |